• Flying Squid
    link
    64 hours ago

    Or, you know, just the ones that are actively posing a threat. Like in all such animal situations.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      -33 hours ago

      So what about humans posing a threat to them? If it’s so rare to have them show up in Iceland, what drove a polar bear to do this? From what I understand, with less ice at the poles it has made it harder for polar bears to hunt seals, leaving many of them starving. As we head towards winter, polar bears have to put on fat stores to survive and feed newborn cubs. It’s really a shame that so many people talk about “animals” as if we aren’t animals too. By your logic, there would be nothing wrong with polar bears rolling into town and eating the species threatening their survival.

      • @lepinkainen
        link
        2
        edit-2
        3 hours ago

        I agree. We should just shoot all fossil fuel company CEOs until they appoint one that agrees to stop polluting the earth so that polar bears have more space to live in 👍🏻

      • Flying Squid
        link
        23 hours ago

        By your logic, there would be nothing wrong with polar bears rolling into town and eating the species threatening their survival.

        How on Earth is that my logic?

        If a specific animal poses a direct threat to humans pretty much anywhere on the planet, that animal is killed. That’s just how things work. I’m sorry polar bears are getting desperate for food due to our causing climate change, but that doesn’t mean we should put people’s lives at risk too.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          03 hours ago

          The difference between the two of us is that you think humans are more important than other animals and I don’t. If this polar bear killed a few humans in Iceland, I’m not saying those particular humans would deserve it, but we as a species do. This polar bear didn’t do anything wrong. It has no capacity to, it was just trying to survive. Maybe instead of destroying anything that may potentially be a threat to humans, we should protect the planet we live on and the habitats of our fellow plants and animals. It’s in our own best interests too. No sense arguing about it though, I doubt either of us will change our minds.

          • Flying Squid
            link
            3
            edit-2
            3 hours ago

            You would not care if a polar bear mauled a playground full of toddlers. Noted.

            Good luck getting pretty much anyone who has any say in these matters to agree with you on that.

              • Flying Squid
                link
                12 hours ago

                Really? Is this you? Because this sure sounds like you saying that the children’s lives matter less than the bear’s since this is your argument to not kill the bear:

                It’s either the bear or the people in a case like this. You don’t wait for it to go on a killing spree at a school and then go, “oopsies!”

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  143 minutes ago

                  Do you seriously lack reading comprehension skills? The section of my comment you’ve pointed out says that I value them equally, not that polar bears are more valuable than humans, and not that humans are more valuable than polar bears. This is why I knew it was pointless to argue with you, because you aren’t doing it in good faith. Go protect your imaginary school from the polar bears massing an imminent attack if you want to act like this.

                  • Flying Squid
                    link
                    129 minutes ago

                    I’m arguing in good faith. This is one polar bear vs. a lot of humans. And you are arguing not to kill the bear. So you obviously put the bear at a higher level than humans.