• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    -43 months ago

    and it too has been accelerating so it doesn’t change the point its just there are some prior emission impacts

    Say you don’t understand emissions measuring without actually saying you don’t understand emissions measuring.

    Past emissions only place emissions up to a value. Current emissions are what determine whether our emissions output is continuing to accelerate, or are actually slowing down.

    And yesterday’s emissions continue to be smaller than today’s emissions. That is why it’s called accelerating emissions.

    • @Cryophilia
      link
      English
      33 months ago

      And yesterday’s emissions continue to be smaller than today’s emissions. That is why it’s called accelerating emissions.

      Not necessarily true. According to the article, it’s quite possible that yesterday’s emissions are the same as today’s emissions. Meaning, we’ve stopped increasing emissions.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        -13 months ago

        Until that graph curves over, it isn’t true.

        Evidence trumps wishes and fantasies. I refuse to get ensnared by hopium.

        • @Cryophilia
          link
          English
          23 months ago

          It’s a prediction. We don’t have accurate data for the current year.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            03 months ago

            And predictions mean absolutely nothing until the evidence is in.

            Problem is, people frequently celebrate predictions, and build policy with those predictions. That’s called jumping the gun.

            • @Cryophilia
              link
              English
              13 months ago

              Keep your panties on, no one is making policy based on this report. At most, people are viewing it with cautious optimism.