• Mubelotix
    link
    fedilink
    English
    -31 year ago

    Bitcoin was invented exactly for use cases like this one

      • @QuazarOmega
        link
        English
        -21 year ago

        You should be blaming the energy source

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          41 year ago

          I do. I also blame wasting the energy that we got from the dangerous source unwisely. If you don’t spend it on shit, less of it will be produced.

          • @QuazarOmega
            link
            English
            11 year ago

            Not really, the endgame is the same, the greedy corporations will exploit the planet’s resources until they’re dry and then they’ll wipe their tears with the money they made in the process, the core issue is really putting sustainability in front of everything else, because not doing so is what deals the real damage

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              21 year ago

              Greedy corporations being the doom of humanity isn’t an excuse for you to fall for a scam that helps bringing said doom. Both can be bad.

              • @QuazarOmega
                link
                English
                31 year ago

                Ok I can agree with that, I also don’t like Bitcoin specifically, but there are other cryptocurrencies which actually have a use and, at the cost of energy of course, empower the users (for privacy, currency transfers, etc.), from what I know only Monero is really worth their salt in that regard as it also uses a proof of work algorithm (RandomX) that is purpose built to be unprofitable to run on power hungry ASICs

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  31 year ago

                  Yeah, they do have their uses, world desperately needs some independent currency everyone can use regardless of race, nationality, borders, government interference, and corporate greed. For now Bitcoin is kind of the only one that everyone knows well enough to trust, given how quickly everything else comes and goes, and it’s very bad because it’s the shitty one

      • Mubelotix
        link
        fedilink
        English
        -91 year ago

        Did you ever wonder why people spent energy for Bitcoin instead of selling it to consumers and industries? It would clearly be more profitable right? You will be surprised to learn that they do when possible. They only mine Bitcoin when it’s the most profitable use of energy, which never happens unless Bitcoin is actually the only available option. People mine with energy they can’t sell or store for technical reasons. Whether that’s because there is not enough demand for it (Africa) or the facility is not connected to the grid. That means people mine Bitcoin with energy that would have been wasted otherwise. That’s neutral for climate

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          10
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Of all the wild, unsupported, and desperate claims, this is definitely one of them.
          That’s not how energy production works, that’s not how supply/demand works, that’s not even how the economics works

    • AtHeartEngineer
      link
      English
      3
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Crypto would actually be a good idea, if we did it on a smart contract platform we could have part of the money go to the user and part go to the platform, but the platform wouldn’t be in control of how that worked, it would be up to the user to decide what % the platform got.

      If this has any serious interest I will shepherd this.

      • Mubelotix
        link
        fedilink
        English
        2
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        We don’t even need smart contracts. Just make the transaction have 2 outputs, one to the platform, one to the user

    • @QuazarOmega
      link
      English
      1
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Maybe you’d use some other crypto, but that aside, while cool in theory, the whole Lemmy would probably have to be reworked from the ground up to rely on the blockchain you’re thinking of like Nostr (sorry, I don’t know what gave me the impression that it was a blockchain). It should be possible to add the function in the current architecture instead, a bit like Misskey and others add extras such as reactions

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        21 year ago

        You don’t really need Lemmy to change anything. Just have the user fill in a wallet field in their profile and Lemmy to have their own wallet address. Now, you can tip a user and have some of that go to Lemmy as well by specifying the ratio in the contract or even having it being customisable by the donor.

        • @QuazarOmega
          link
          English
          11 year ago

          That sounds interesting, although I could see people creating their own instance to send awards that look the same for free, maybe they should be limited to being displayed on the same instance they were awarded from?

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            31 year ago

            Well, the badge can be displayed only after the transaction is confirmed on the blockchain. Easy way to verify and prevent spam awards.

            • Mubelotix
              link
              fedilink
              English
              11 year ago

              That would really work great and it’s not even hard to make. 300 likes of code would do the whole thing

        • @QuazarOmega
          link
          English
          31 year ago

          You’re right, I misunderstood how it worked, corrected now