Israel’s occupation of Lebanon created Hezbollah, just like their occupation of Gaza created Hamas. This is what we call the consequences of one’s actions.
On side exists for the sole reason that the other attacked them and repeatedly tried to invade them, twice. Indeed, if they continue their aggression, war is inevitable.
The resulting expulsion, massacre, and ethnic cleansing was not a UN mandate, mind you the bribes and threats the west used against vassal states and banana republics to get mandate passed make your point moot anyway.
Really? False nonsensical accusations of a strawman without even clarifying what you mean? I understand. The standard tu quoques won’t work here and you need a minute. I’ll wait.
One side exists for the sole purpose of eliminating the other. Pretty sure war is inevitable in that scenario.
I don’t know if I’d describe Israel in such absolute terms. Surely it serves some purpose other than genocide, right?
Yes, zionists are ready to genocide many people in pursuit of stealing even more land.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Greater_Israel
Israel’s occupation of Lebanon created Hezbollah, just like their occupation of Gaza created Hamas. This is what we call the consequences of one’s actions.
Everyone everywhere to have ever existed is a product of their environment, but that doesn’t mean Nazis shouldn’t be shot in the face.
On side exists for the sole reason that the other attacked them and repeatedly tried to invade them, twice. Indeed, if they continue their aggression, war is inevitable.
BS. The Coastal Road massacre started all that between Israel and Lebanon.
BS. The Nakbah started all that.
But more specifically Hezbollah started after the second invasion of Lebanon.
You mean the Palestinian rebellion against a UN mandate that had nothing to do with Lebanon? Nope.
The resulting expulsion, massacre, and ethnic cleansing was not a UN mandate, mind you the bribes and threats the west used against vassal states and banana republics to get mandate passed make your point moot anyway.
No, your ignoring the salient point ‘nothing to do with Lebanon’ makes your point moot.
Pure strawman. Par for the course for Zionists.
Really? False nonsensical accusations of a strawman without even clarifying what you mean? I understand. The standard tu quoques won’t work here and you need a minute. I’ll wait.
do you think Hezbollah would exist in the same way if it was British people colonizing the land?
Is it an anti Jewish organisation or an anti colonial organisation?
Yes.
You can tell zios are honest and decent people by the sincere and open way in which they express their viewpoints. \s \s \s
They could be worse. They could be anti-zios.
Anti-Zionism is the default status, same as anti-fascism is.
😆 Citation please.
Being a basic human with empathy and not a nationalistic piece of shit.
Nationalism and racism are taught behaviours.
So, no supporting evidence. Got it. 😂