• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    36
    edit-2
    20 hours ago

    I’m as much a fan of schadenfreude as the next guy, but every test brings this weapon closer to the battle field.

      • @FilthyShrooms
        link
        English
        110 hours ago

        Sadly that’s not how it works, especially with government money. A good example is SpaceX, they succeeded so fast because they failed fast and learned fast. Failure is always progress as long as you don’t give up

        That being said the Russians should totally give up

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      2120 hours ago

      Still i bet russia would prefer that they had Sarmat working so they could use it as a threat.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        1419 hours ago

        Of course! I’d also like all my programs to run fine without bugs the first time. But that’s just not the nature of things. What we’re seeing here is, ummm, hardware debugging. It’s the process of getting to a reliable delivery system unfolding in real time.

        That said, this quest for a Super Weapon that will force the West to finally recognize Russia as a Real Power Once and For All is super fucking creepy. It’s equal parts Bond villain and the final years of another famous European dictator. Neither are exciting prospects for world security.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          1619 hours ago

          It did run fine the first time :) then the next 4 launches failed. My hope is that sanctions and bright pepole leaving russia has made in hard to launch nukes. We will see.