Three individuals targeted National Gallery paintings an hour after Phoebe Plummer and Anna Holland were jailed for similar attack in 2022

Three individuals targeted National Gallery paintings an hour after Phoebe Plummer and Anna Holland were jailed for similar attack in 2022

Climate activists have thrown tomato soup over two Sunflowers paintings by Vincent van Gogh, just an hour after two others were jailed for a similar protest action in 2022.

Three supporters of Just Stop Oil walked into the National Gallery in London, where an exhibition of Van Gogh’s collected works is on display, at 2.30pm on Friday afternoon, and threw Heinz soup over Sunflowers 1889 and Sunflowers 1888.

The latter was the same work targeted by Phoebe Plummer and Anna Holland in 2022. That pair are now among 25 supporters of Just Stop Oil in jail for climate protests.

  • @[email protected]English
    9•3 months ago

    I feel like we’re kind of entering an era where direct action and ecology-motivated terrorism are going to start becoming a thing. And I’m honestly not sure that would be a bad thing.

    • BrightCandleEnglish
      5•3 months ago

      Peaceful protests have not worked, disruptive protests have been widely villified and the protestors jailed for very long sentences. If you are facing 2-3 years for holding up a banner or throwing some paint seems like criminal damage of a fossil fuel facility isn’t likely to net more years. As many have said in the past governments ignore peaceful protests at their peril, because once its clear that doesn’t work they become not peaceful.

      • @[email protected]English
        1•3 months ago

        If everything is illegal, nothing is illegal.

        If you’re gonna get thrown in jail if you’re caught regardless, why not go for broke?

        • @ClinicallydepressedpoochieEnglish
          1•3 months ago

          To fight another day. If every passionate soul bound themselves to another rather then fizzling out or going up flames then we could become many.

    • @WaxedWookieEnglish
      0•3 months ago

      Assuming there’s no collateral damage to speak of, I’d argue it would be an act of self-defence for the benefit of all of us. In principle, I’d struggle to find reason to be upset by it.

      • _NoName_English
        6•3 months ago

        There will be collateral damage. There always is. The idea there wouldn’t be collateral damage is already setting the bar higher than is feasible.

        • @WaxedWookieEnglish
          -1•3 months ago

          I don’t think that’s true at all, but if it is, it becomes a question of whether that damage is outweighed by the benefit of the action.