• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    6
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    In their defense, birth order rarely correlated with their name - Decimus could just as easily be a firstborn child, or the fifth son.

    This is something, I find more weird than defending. Or, in other words, TIL Romans were bad at counting.

    • @PugJesusOPM
      link
      English
      6
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      Well, at least you don’t have a Primus in every family that way!

      Or, in other words, TIL Romans were bad at counting.

      lmao, there are other examples of Roman weirdness with numbers. For most of the Republic period, the year was expressed not by a number, but by which two consuls were elected that year. Ab Urbe Condita (AUC, ‘From the founding of the city’) was much more rare. “Draw 25 or use numbers like normal human beings.”

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        32 months ago

        I know about the way Romans counted time. Isn’t also in the Bible, the year Jesus was born given as the year x of the reign of Augustus? Later, the pope who established the AD counting had lots of struggle summing up all the years of the emperors without counting some years twice.

        • @PugJesusOPM
          link
          English
          32 months ago

          Yep! In the Empire, there were often numerous consuls in a year instead of just two (being rotated out as a kind of ‘gift’ from the Emperor) so the norm for counting the year changed to how many years since the ruling Emperor came into power.

          Funny how some things we take for granted, like an unborked date system, are actually innovations, and far from timeless (ha).

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            22 months ago

            TY, I didn’t know, there were still consules in the Roman Empire.
            Yes, a continuous calendar system makes things a lot easier.

        • wanderer
          link
          English
          32 months ago

          Isn’t also in the Bible, the year Jesus was born given as the year x of the reign of Augustus?

          No, it isn’t. Descriptions of when he was born are vague and contradictory.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            3
            edit-2
            2 months ago

            Indeed, e.g. the text of the Lukas Evangelium isn’t that precise as I’ve thought I remember it.

    • @trolololol
      link
      English
      32 months ago

      Of course they were. I give you proof they’re even worse at math. Tell me quick, how much is

      CMDIV + CCDDVIII

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        32 months ago

        You actually needed to be ‘very good’ at math to fluently calculate with Roman numbers. However, I can’t make sense of your examples.