@[email protected] to Programmer [email protected] • 12 hours agoof=/dev/sdaprogramming.devimagemessage-square38fedilinkarrow-up1338arrow-down18
arrow-up1330arrow-down1imageof=/dev/sdaprogramming.dev@[email protected] to Programmer [email protected] • 12 hours agomessage-square38fedilink
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink2•6 hours agoIt would be pretty useless if cd was a child process that changed its own directory, only to return to bash and be back where you started.
minus-square@[email protected]OPlinkfedilink30•12 hours ago-1 accuracy point ( ◞ ﹏ ◟) linux 4.5-rc5 had efivarfs fixed to prevent “rm -rf /” bricking uefi motherboards – so maybe someone can try it out? :]
minus-square@HighlyRegardedArtistlink3•8 hours agoThis is one of the reasons I’ve disabled uefi by default with the noefi kernel parameter, the other reason being the LogoFAIL exploit: https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Unified_Extensible_Firmware_Interface#Disable_UEFI_variable_access
… but
cd
is a built-inIt would be pretty useless if cd was a child process that changed its own directory, only to return to bash and be back where you started.
-1 accuracy point ( ◞ ﹏ ◟)
linux 4.5-rc5 had efivarfs fixed to prevent “rm -rf /” bricking uefi motherboards – so maybe someone can try it out? :]
This is one of the reasons I’ve disabled uefi by default with the
noefi
kernel parameter, the other reason being the LogoFAIL exploit: https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Unified_Extensible_Firmware_Interface#Disable_UEFI_variable_access