• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    272 months ago

    Sounds like NHTSA recommended the veto so we don’t end up with competing standards.

    Good move, IMO. For a system as large as this, with severe safety implications, you really don’t want to start on the wrong foot.

    • @[email protected]OP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      32 months ago

      you really don’t want to start on the wrong foot.

      We all be walkin’ here. GET OUT (I kid)

    • Justin
      link
      fedilink
      English
      1
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      The article doesn’t say that the NHTSA asked Newsom to veto, just that they were working on a similar regulation.

      It sounded like the car companies just wanted him to veto it so they could keep reckless drivers as a customer base.

      The proposed regulation only kicks in at 10 mph over the speed limit (ie reckless driving and deadly to pedestrians)

      • @brygphilomena
        link
        English
        82 months ago

        It’s weird to see 10mph considered reckless driving.

        In California, 10mph over is the slow lane.

          • @brygphilomena
            link
            English
            22 months ago

            In residential I tend to go around 15-20 instead of the posted 25. I’m almost never in a hurry. I drive a 20 year old 2 seater convertible sports car, not a truck.

            I was talking about highways. Posted speeds are 65 for the vast majority of them. Many are 5 lanes in each direction. If you go 65, you will be passed by 99% of traffic, including semi trucks. Most traffic is going 75-80mph and it’s not uncommon to have the entire freeway cruising around there. At 65, you may be following the law, but you become an obstacle. I’ve been on highways on Sundays where traffic is flowing almost at 90mph. And I don’t mean a few cars weaving, I mean almost everyone.

            California freeways can be nuts.