• AsakuraMao
    link
    fedilink
    -178 hours ago

    You’re talking about blame assignment, but I am instead referring to the fact that in both the Nintendo and the automotive example that somebody got smacked because they weren’t careful enough.

    • skulblaka
      link
      fedilink
      208 hours ago

      Somebody got smacked because they were told that this was a safe area to be in. Then they get hit, and are blamed for not being careful enough in the area they were told was safe to be in.

      • AsakuraMao
        link
        fedilink
        -157 hours ago

        Like I said above, everyone coming through here is so obsessed with talking about blame and fault. That’s not what I’m talking about at all. I’m saying that if Ryujinx wanted to avoid this outcome, they should have done things differently.

        See, no mention of blame at all. How else do I need to spell things out for the extremely autistic and pedantic crowd here?

        • @jeeva
          link
          4
          edit-2
          2 hours ago

          if Ryujinx wanted to avoid this outcome, they should have done things differently

          How do you not read this as blame? Or, is this not the same as “they had it coming, wouldn’t have happened if they’d been dressed in armour or hadn’t gone down that street alone” which is often known as victim blaming.

          Oh, there’s a wiki article on that. It has a section on the thing you’re arguing about, with cars and pedestrians Neat. Maybe this is why people are talking about it.