• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    1195 months ago

    The court’s decision in Toma’s case may have stemmed from several factors. When Sencuk applied for the protective order, he indicated Toma was a roommate — not the homeowner — so the nature of their relationship may not have been clear to the judge.

    Additionally, Sencuk claimed he and Toma had an agreement that he would perform various maintenance and chores around the property in exchange for living in the garage, which may have seemed credible to the court. Toma denies this arrangement ever existed.

    However, since the protective order was issued, Sencuk has moved out.

    The guy never claimed “squatters rights,” he sought a protective order against the other people in the house and lied to get it, then moved out before it was even issued

    • @Zexks
      link
      English
      145 months ago

      The judge who signed this needs to be disbarred. JUDICIAL OVERSIGHT. Can we get some god damn.