• Avid Amoeba
    link
    fedilink
    15
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    Prediction: Bibi’s gonna do it anyway in an attempt to get Harris to lose (gas price increases in the US) and get Trump reelected. Trump then signs Bibi’s get-out-of-jail-free card, and he’s good to continue.

    • Tedesche
      link
      English
      42 months ago

      I don’t think Bibi’s choices will affect the U.S. election, only if Biden chooses to get American forces directly involved, which is not what’s happening.

      • Avid Amoeba
        link
        fedilink
        12 months ago

        An attack that damages oil infra that reduces oil supply will immediately result in oil price increases. It doesn’t even have to materially affect the supply yet for the prices to react. It doesn’t matter who conducts the attack either. The prices at the pump in the US will follow shortly after. I think I heard the estimate is 5%. Then corpos will raise prices because “oil went up by 5%” and you have inflation in an election period following a period of high inflation that Democrats just managed to get down. Trump will frame it as geopolitical and economic mismanagement. This could tip the scales in a close election enough for it to go to Trump.

        Then there’s the possibility of retaliatory attacks on tankers in the Red Sea. There’s another 5-10% expected from that.

        None of this mechanism depends on US army’s involvement in the conflict.

        • Tedesche
          link
          English
          22 months ago

          Perhaps. On the other hand, conservatives love supporting Israel and attacking Muslims, so maybe that’ll balance things out? Regardless, I don’t an increase in oil prices will tip the scales anywhere near as much as direct U.S. military involvement would. It’s a complex calculus.

          • Avid Amoeba
            link
            fedilink
            12 months ago

            Oh direct involvement would definitely make a bigger move. In which direction I don’t know.