• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    73 months ago

    My thinking would be why risk not getting checked out? Unfortunately worst case scenario happened this time :(

    • 【J】【u】【s】【t】【Z】
      link
      8
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      The indication for testing according the CDC is a bite.

      The rabies test is cheap. Could have tested the kid or the bat, but again why would they do it if there’s no indication for exposure. This was the first case in the province of someone being infected with rabies inside their own home since 1967.

      When you hear hoofbeats you don’t think it’s zebras.

        • 【J】【u】【s】【t】【Z】
          link
          1
          edit-2
          3 months ago

          There’s like eleven kinds of blood tests for rabies. None of them work on people, or is it by the time they work it’s too late?

            • 【J】【u】【s】【t】【Z】
              link
              13 months ago

              Okay that’s sort of what I thought.

              So the protocol, from like an insurance coverage decision-tree standpoint, in this situation, would have been to test the bat if possible and if not possible administer the vaccine?

              I was under the impression that the vaccine is pretty awful and a health ordeal in itself, and that while the dose wasn’t expensive, the aftercare is.

              And that is why, as I understand, the CDC protocol is only seek medical attention if there’s a visible bite.