• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    013 hours ago

    Really in a “Soviet command economy” private citizens could create a business to monopolize necessities as implied above?

    • @PugJesus
      link
      English
      613 hours ago

      In a Soviet command economy the state would be running the business where they restrict something humans require to live and then sell it. It’s not much more than a monopoly with total vertical integration and low responsiveness to price signals. The advantage is that the state can set priorities independent of profits; it still remains a money-oriented system on the consumer level.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        113 hours ago

        Right I get that but I don’t think that applies to the meme as above and you come of a bit “well actually”

        • @PugJesus
          link
          English
          513 hours ago

          Capitalism could not be explained any simpler

          explains something that is not unique to capitalism

          🤷‍♂️

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            113 hours ago

            The two people discussing starting a business to do it though…

            You’re just going too hard here Pug my man it’s a meme

            • @PugJesus
              link
              English
              4
              edit-2
              13 hours ago

              The two people discussing starting a business to do it though…

              [taps market socialism example]

              [taps feudal economy]

              [taps the fact that even in command economies decision-makers in the state must make the decision to begin and monopolize the industry at some point, it just doesn’t have any competitors; this very scenario must happen at the start of every industry in a command economy]

              You’re just going too hard here Pug my man it’s a meme

              It’s a political meme. If it’s not being fought over, is it even worth the name?