• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    0
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    Ah, by “socialism” you mean, like, Norway. On Lemmy people usually mean the USSR when they say that. I think OP meant socialist like the USSR.

    Most of the Volt platforms I’ve looked at are pretty pro-welfare.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      21 day ago

      Norway? You think it’s only one or a few countries?

      The UK, Australia, almost every European country. All of them have a lot of structures made possible by socialism. Even America has some socialist constructs.

      I think you might be thinking of “communism” which nowadays means the opposite. Like how neither Russia or China are actually communist. Both have an authoritarian state and lots of capitalism, with a tiny bit of socialism.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        1
        edit-2
        1 day ago

        I mean, the actual historical definition of socialism is “collective ownership of the means of production”, and the actual historical definition of communism is “a classless, stateless society that will inevitably follow capitalism, according to Marx”. The USSR only ever claimed to be working towards communism, and referred to themselves as “socialist”.

        Nowadays the words can mean something different, depending on who uses them.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          11 day ago

          Well yes, but you misjudged what I said as I used the correct terms.

          So my point is again, there are many people that believe in socialist constructs, and are therefor partly socialist.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            1
            edit-2
            1 day ago

            If you mean you were using the historical definitions, a social safety net is not a means of production. Government-run factories or mines would be socialist, although some purists insist that it’s not socialist until there’s no private ownership left at all.

            If you mean you were using the popular definitions, sure, people like government services. Volt also likes government services.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              11 day ago

              Services fall under “Means of production”. So yes, these safety nets are part of socialism. Taxes going back to the people as well.

              I don’t want to try and figure out the perfect semantics for all of this.

    • @Maalus
      link
      English
      11 day ago

      USSR wasn’t socialist in any way, are you here just to troll?

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        11 day ago

        How have you been on Lemmy for over a year, and still not run into people who think it was?

        (For my part, I think words have the definition we give them)

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                English
                0
                edit-2
                1 day ago

                Ah, well you’re actually fairly new. There will be more, and ones who personally strongly believe it.

                Here’s a graph of activity by instance. Hexbear, lemmygrad and lemmy.ml will all ban you for slagging off Stalin, and together they’re maybe a third of it. It’s because the devs are in that crowd.

                Again, I just try to use words people will understand. My opinion of the USSR is that it was a state existing roughly between 1920 and 1990.

                • @Maalus
                  link
                  English
                  21 day ago

                  Cool. Just join an instance that block their ass then.