They line up in front of a courthouse in southeastern France, from morning to evening, and have gathered in the thousands in cities across the country. They hold signs reading, “one rape every six minutes,” “not all men but always a man,” and “giving in is not consenting.”

They chant: “Rapist we see you, victim we believe you.”

Women across France are rallying in support of Gisèle Pelicot, a 72-year-old reluctant icon whose husband is on trial in the city of Avignon for systematically drugging her and inviting dozens of men, 50 of whom are now his co-defendants, into their home to rape her over nearly a decade.

The shocking case has sparked what many women in France call a long-overdue reckoning over “rape culture” and systemic sexism in the way the judicial system handles sexual violence.

  • @fne8w2ah
    link
    English
    12 months ago

    So basically, “not all men and not all women” should have been the slogan in the first place.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      22 months ago

      So basically, “not all men and not all women” should have been the slogan in the first place.

      Yes. That is a very even and equal statement that properly balances the reality of the situation.

      But equality was never their goal. That’s why those who have rationally and logically studied the ideology call the practitioners female supremacists, and are likely to call themselves egalitarianists.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        22 months ago

        rationally and logically studied the ideology call the practitioners female supremacists,

        Wow. That was remarkably mask off. You watch a lot of Ben Shapiro, buddy?

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          1
          edit-2
          1 month ago

          Ben Shapiro is a moron. And so is pretty much anyone who has ever punted the “alpha male” narrative.

          What I do, exclusively, is listen to what “feminists” say, and compare it to not only reality, but also how any flip-side examples for men are perceived. From there it is clear that the ideology is one of gender supremacy. There is no other possible interpretation, because there is no equality in their objectives. Any “benefits” that men accrue from feminism are purely by happenstance and lucky accident, but the foundation and exclusive intent of any one incident has always been female-first and almost always to the intentional exclusion of men.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            01 month ago

            And what does that mean, you fill a document with feminist phrases and ctrl+v over every word ‘woman’ the word ‘man’? That is… wow, that is incredibly academic. I’m actually hit-stunned by how smart that is.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              11 month ago

              And what does that mean, you fill a document with feminist phrases and ctrl+v over every word ‘woman’ the word ‘man’? That is… wow, that is incredibly academic. I’m actually hit-stunned by how smart that is.

              If that’s the best you can come up with, then you are just as bad as Ben Shapiro.