• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    24
    edit-2
    20 hours ago

    You would think some alien species would figure out a way to make sure the worst individuals aren’t put in charge of production and energy generation, as opposed to how us humans apparently have evolved to do.

    If you take a long term view of things you could just not do the thing that cooks the planet until you figure out a technological solution for it, instead of going head first for it because that’s the most profitable thing to do this quarter.

    • @samus12345
      link
      English
      8
      edit-2
      13 hours ago

      Maybe every time sapient life manages to evolve to dominate a planet, being selfish pricks like us is the only way their species was able to survive to get to that point, so they always end up destroying themselves. Would explain the Fermi paradox.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        2
        edit-2
        7 hours ago

        I feel this is a very anthropocentric view of things, projecting our own failings (some of which are coded in our genes) and assuming they’re some kind of universal law of nature.

        It’s basically assuming that somehow every intelligent species would choose capitalism as their organising principle, something we’ve only ‘decided’ on 200 years ago.

    • The Snark Urge
      link
      English
      2220 hours ago

      If you take a long term view of things

      This is probably why they had to use aliens for the hypothetical scenario.