Sjmarf to People [email protected] • 2 days agoThe value of xsh.itjust.worksimagemessage-square141fedilinkarrow-up11.12Karrow-down119
arrow-up11.11Karrow-down1imageThe value of xsh.itjust.worksSjmarf to People [email protected] • 2 days agomessage-square141fedilink
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish14•1 day agoThis is the geometry version of those stupid poorly written math equations. Engagement bait. The real answer is always “it’s unsolveable due to poor/missing notation”.
minus-square@PM_Your_Nudes_Pleaselink4•edit-24 hours agoIt’s not unsolvable at all. The answer is x=135°. The triangles simply aren’t drawn to scale; The line between them isn’t a 90° angle, (even though it is drawn that way) because it is not specifically marked as 90° with a square angle mark.
This is the geometry version of those stupid poorly written math equations. Engagement bait.
The real answer is always “it’s unsolveable due to poor/missing notation”.
It’s not unsolvable at all. The answer is x=135°. The triangles simply aren’t drawn to scale; The line between them isn’t a 90° angle, (even though it is drawn that way) because it is not specifically marked as 90° with a square angle mark.
But it’s not unsolvable, just a misleading drawing…