• @leftofjillstein
    link
    -461 month ago

    We are currently in a fascist regime; both parties are heavily lobbied by corporations that dictate policy.

    People continue to struggle more and more under both parties, while they play political theater to continue to divide us.

    Voting outside the two-party system will help establish that people do have standards when voting.

    Voting is one - an important one.

    Yes, and a good percentage of the populace decides to stay in and not reward the duopoly with their vote.

    • dual_sport_dork 🐧🗡️
      link
      391 month ago

      The problem with this take is that you cannot conversely punish the duopoly by withholding your vote, regardless of whether or not you think they “earned” it. Even if you don’t vote, one of them still gets in. The problem is, the people who are going to vote for the significantly worse of the two options are very motivated to vote, and they will do so.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        131 month ago

        Yeah. Somehow they think that if they don’t vote- no one gets elected. They don’t understand that a decision will be made without their input.

        Or they do, and that’s the entire point.

      • @leftofjillstein
        link
        -311 month ago

        The Lord won’t help us on this one; we need to be the ones to fight for what we demand.

        The civil rights movements happened because people were fed up with the status quo.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          151 month ago

          The presidential election year before the Voting Rights Act of 1965 saw relatively high voter turnout. 61.4%

          https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Voter_turnout_in_United_States_presidential_elections

          People voted in the Democratic Party candidate by a wide margin. 61.1%

          https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1964_United_States_presidential_election

          If we protest, but then don’t vote, nothing will change. So voting in records numbers is the answer. Specifically, in our present case, voting for the party that wants to improve things incrementally over fascists.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                11 month ago

                And the Democrats are perpetrating a genocide, sending cops and SWAT after students and people protesting that genocide, not letting them talk at the DNC, and trying to suppress their freedom of speech and assembly. That’s also very fascist.

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  11 month ago

                  The Democrats are neoliberals. As neoliberals, they are both center-right and institutionalists, so they do stuff like police crack downs on protesters. This is not fascism on its own. Denying a speaking slot to the Uncommitted Movement was a strategic failure, but it is not fascism.

                  Biden is a Zionist, so on top of sticking to 70 years of US foreign policy of allying with Israel he has been actively complicit in genocide. Zionism is a form of fascism that attempts to manipulate Jews and Christians alike to build a Jewish ethnostate. Not everyone who is a self-described Zionist is inherently bought into the actual ideology. There are plenty of people who want a place for Jewish people to be safe. Zionism is not that, but there have been plenty of people who have been fooled into thinking it is. Biden is not a fascist, but he has given the fascists in Israel nearly everything they wanted. Thankfully Biden has so far refused Israel’s request to attack Iran.

                  Also, thankfully Kamala is running for president, not Biden. Kamala is not a lifelong Zionist. Kamala has said she is willing to defend Israel, but being willing to defend a long standing ally is not the same as letting them do whatever they want. Under Kamala, the Democrats are going to do everything in their power to get a ceasefire deal to end the war and the genocide.

                  Trump is on record as saying Israel needs to finish what they started. Trump is going to let Israel complete its genocide of the Palestinians. He’s going to allow the war to continue indefinitely so Benjamin Netanyahu can stay out of prison, deny Palestinian statehood, and form a greater Israel by conquering as much of the Middle East as possible.

                  https://www.cnn.com/2024/04/04/politics/trump-israel-comments/index.html

                  https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/donald-trump/trump-israel-gaza-finish-problem-rcna141905

                  The Republican Party has been taken over by the fascist MAGA movement, not the Democratic Party. Trump is the fascist, not Kamala. And Trump being elected would be worse for the Palestinians and the Middle East as a whole. So we should strategically vote for Kamala.

                  • @[email protected]
                    link
                    fedilink
                    1
                    edit-2
                    1 month ago

                    Kamala has already said they won’t institute an arms embargo, which is basically the one material thing she can do to restrict Israel, and has put all the blame on Iran. Without that on the table and the other rhetoric, she’s saying the same thing as Trump but with nicer words, she will allow them to finish the job. Sure she’s covering it by saying she’ll try for a ceasefire, but so has Biden for months now and that’s gone well. The war with Iran she’s hinting at is basically Biden’s policy and it plays right into Israel’s hand. It let’s them continue the he genocide, avoid a ceasefire, take more land, keep elections suspended and Bibi in power, and let’s us continue to destabilize the Middle East as we have always done. Trump’s rhetoric is bloodthirsty, Kamala’s is ostensibly more apologetic (except for the most lethal army in the world bit), but in the end, it’s the same thing.

                    I was hopeful Kamala was different than Biden, too, but so far, she has not shown any difference whatsoever. To believe otherwise is naive, it’s trusting in the same lie that’s been repeated for months and led to nothing. She’d have to say something concrete to change my mind again, like she’s replacing Blinken with someone more progressive or she will agree to stop vetoing resolutions against Israel, or something. Just saying you’re going to work at a ceasefire without saying how is just running on vibes.

            • wildncrazyguy138
              link
              fedilink
              01 month ago

              Please provide examples to justify your claim. I’d like to know more. I’ll give you your first one since it’s everywhere in the headlines nowadays - weapons to Israel.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          151 month ago

          There is the right to cast a vote, also a right to protest.

          Please don’t confuse the two and protest by not voting.

          • @leftofjillstein
            link
            -211 month ago

            Voting and protesting: to create a better society, people need to be willing to demand more than what the status quo can provide.

        • @breakingcups
          link
          131 month ago

          How is giving your vote to whoever becomes the largest by not voting winning anything? You can do all the other things you mentioned and still make a conscious choice to do the least harm by not voting a demagogue in. It’s just one of the many steps you can take as a person wishing to influence the world around you.

          Just like eating no meat or less meat. Will it fix everything wrong with farming? No. Does that mean you should just start buying more meat and not eat it, letting it rot in your fridge instead? Also no! No one cares if you did that and it accomplishes nothing except make the problem much worse, which is exactly what not voting gets you.

          • @leftofjillstein
            link
            -171 month ago

            Again, the duopoly is the staus quo, it will not help fix the systematic problems our society faces.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              61 month ago

              Then get involved in a 3rd party that works against the republican fascists and coordinates with Democrats for ballot access like WFP.

              Whining about “the duopoly” and not voting will just move things further right.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      231 month ago

      Reading comments like this is unbelievably frustrating, because you’re so close to being right, but you refuse to take that next tiny step, which makes you dangerously wrong.

      Yes, both parties are lobbied out the ass, it’s bad and it’s wrong, but which party at least tries to mitigate the harm? Yes, there’s unproductive political theater that divides, but which party at least tries to talk about real issues that matter to everyday voters?

      Your approach is akin to burning down the house instead of doing the hard work of fixing the roof. You will never get the outcome you imagine by voting for a third party, unless you do the hard work of improving our overall system, from inside the system. You play the game with the team you have, not the team you want.

    • @Eldritch
      link
      English
      161 month ago

      We are currently in a fascist regime; both parties are heavily lobbied by corporations that dictate policy.

      That’s not fascism.

      People continue to struggle more and more under both parties, while they play political theater to continue to divide us.

      100% people need to engage more. And in national elections quit voting for 3rd parties. Showing solidarity with and not dividing themselves from the rest of the left. Till our voting system is reformed and 3rd party presidential candidates are no longer a mathematical impossibility. With the only message being sent, that you’re safe to ignore.

      Voting outside the two-party system will help establish that people do have standards when voting.

      That’s literally the exact opposite of what it does.

      Yes, and a good percentage of the populace decides to stay in and not reward the duopoly with their vote.

      Then they get the lack of change they’ve committed to.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        41 month ago

        Why is it that any time these pseudo-intellectual “leftists” pop up to spew their bullshit, they’re knocked back by like… 5-10 people that absolutely school them and in the end, all they can respond is-

        “Nuh-uhh!”

        And then rinse and repeat the following day. What do they think they’re accomplishing? I mean, it’s especially very telling that they’re downvoted into the dark ages on a platform that supposedly leans heavily in their direction.

        This says a lot in my opinion. In that there may be hope for lemmy once the election is over and these vapid people eventually collapse in on themselves like a dying star.

        • @Eldritch
          link
          English
          51 month ago

          THEY ALWAYS COME BACK. But it will be quieter for a year or two. If they’re sincere, and some are. They’re suffering form the same mental weakness/illness that the MAGATS are. They want to believe they are righteous, correct, and in possession of special knowledge or insight. That they believe those that disagree with them can’t comprehend.

          If they’re not sincere. Well they’re still like the MAGATS. Malicious, spiteful, and crab mentally. Either hypocritically, simply anti-west like most ML you see. Or benefiting disproportionately on the backs of labor. And know the best way to keep labor down. Is to divide it against itself. Kind of like ML governments do as well.