As a non-American, I don’t know exactly how your polling works, but why am I seeing “plan your voting day” or “set a voting strategy” like they’ve done on the Cards Against Humanity voting campaign?

Where I live, it’s just show up on voting day and cast your ballot, or ask for a mail in ballot, or go to a special voting station if you need (or want) to vote early. Is it the same in the US, and this is just getting people to gather those last pieces of information early and put a reminder in the calendar? Or is there more to it than that?

Thanks!

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    552 months ago

    To discourage people from voting. As was pointed out elsewhere, the Republicans only really flourish when a small number of people vote. So they make it as inconvenient as possible for people who are lower income, usually people of colour.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      232 months ago

      Wait what? And that sort of things is legal? Are you serious? You know, there are countries where voting is obligatory, and others where it is made as easy as possible.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        232 months ago

        Wait til you learn about Gerrymandering. I’ll not get into it in depth, but essentially the local/state government in the US will set up voting regions to guarantee that one party has a massive advantage.

        • Prison Mike
          link
          fedilink
          4
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          I like how I vividly remember learning about this in middle school and being told it’s illegal, then as an adult I just see it happening???

          • @visor841
            link
            22 months ago

            It’s only illegal federally to gerrymander to dilute minorities. Otherwise it’s up to the individual states.

        • @stoned_ape
          link
          22 months ago

          Bruh the shit going on in Ohio this election cycle where LaRose has reworded (see also the abortion amendment where his “summary” was longer than the actual text of the amendment) the ballot to obfuscate the actual intent of Issue 1 to make people vote No which helps consolidate the Republicans grip

          It’s ridiculous. My wife is relatively intelligent and she doesn’t understand the wording on the ballot and I explained to her that despite the reading, a No vote will continue the status quo. Like I’m a free speech kind of guy but just put the damn text on the damn ballot like don’t bullshit us Frankie!

          Fuckin schmucks

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            22 months ago

            But if they don’t do everything they can to obfuscate the ramifications of voting No then everyone would vote Yes!

            They know what they’re doing is against the wishes of the majority, otherwise they would put the choices in plain language, or weight the obfuscation the other way…

      • @rsuri
        link
        7
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        Wait what? And that sort of things is legal?

        Technically no, if it can be proven that the goal is racial discrimination specifically. Every so often there’s a lawsuit claiming just that. Problem is, it tends to get resolved by the Supreme Court which is two-thirds chosen by the “let’s make it harder to vote” party.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          42 months ago

          Reading this discussion has made me understand a little bit better why America seems to be always on fire…

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        3
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        That’s cool but the post was clearly about the USA where they have made voting a miserable fucking experience.