• @dohpaz42
    link
    English
    9
    edit-2
    10 hours ago

    But the law also includes this language:

    Whoever makes or offers to make an expenditure to any person, either to vote… or to vote for…

    I take that to mean to pay someone to vote, or to vote for someone. And in this case, CAH is definitely paying people to vote.

    • Rentlar
      link
      fedilink
      288 hours ago

      The reward is specifically for people to come up with a plan on how they would vote. The reward isn’t technically contingent on someone acting on that plan.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      258 hours ago

      Legally speaking they’re not paying people to vote, only to do voting-adjacent tasks which is legal

      The Register went into the more detail on the legality of it all

      • @dohpaz42
        link
        English
        24 hours ago

        Thank you. Im glad to be wrong, and it’s good to see someone dissecting this issue.

    • 🅿🅸🆇🅴🅻
      link
      24
      edit-2
      7 hours ago

      They’re paying people to apologize for not voting last time. What that means is up for the reader. Not the same.