• Ð Greıt Þu̇mpkin
    link
    fedilink
    02 months ago

    No it wouldn’t, the two largest parties from that first vote would eventually consume everything else and then we’d be right back where we started.

    Unless you intend to abolish FPTP, arguing your intention to vote third party is mathematically the same as arguing your intention to vote for the 2 party candidate who is least like you.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      22 months ago

      You do know a vote is worth more than just the tally it adds to your candidate right? A vote not changing the result of an election is not the same as not having an effect on politics.

      • Ð Greıt Þu̇mpkin
        link
        fedilink
        -12 months ago

        No, it literally is the tally. Under FPTP it is entirely just the tally.

        This math has been explained endlessly, trying to escape the proven math doesn’t make you some believer in higher ideals and callings, it makes you complicit in the destruction of the republic.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          32 months ago

          Well claiming proven math just isnt the slam dunk you think it is unfortunately. But you are allowed your perspective, I just disagree with it.

          • Ð Greıt Þu̇mpkin
            link
            fedilink
            -22 months ago

            The math doesn’t care about your traitor perspective.

            Defend the republic or be counted with the fascists who destroyed it.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              32 months ago

              How many people do you think who you’ve called a traitor are actually going to agree with your position for it? Its eerie how similar that rhetoric is to the republicans right now.