@[email protected]M to Minneapolis - St. Paul [email protected]English • 2 months agoTice: Walz is wrong about the Electoral Collegewww.startribune.comexternal-linkmessage-square8fedilinkarrow-up13arrow-down129file-text
arrow-up1-26arrow-down1external-linkTice: Walz is wrong about the Electoral Collegewww.startribune.com@[email protected]M to Minneapolis - St. Paul [email protected]English • 2 months agomessage-square8fedilinkfile-text
minus-square@Ledivinlink14•edit-22 months agoYeah, it turns out that changing the data changes the results 🙄 Since we’re just doing random shit and seeing what it looks like, how much did she win by if we remove Texas?
minus-square@[email protected]OPMlinkfedilink3•2 months agoYeah, I misread the argument and thought it was saying something more interesting 🤦 It’s actually a silly argument and now I regret posting the article, but at least there was some good discussion of how bad it is.
Yeah, it turns out that changing the data changes the results 🙄
Since we’re just doing random shit and seeing what it looks like, how much did she win by if we remove Texas?
Yeah, I misread the argument and thought it was saying something more interesting 🤦 It’s actually a silly argument and now I regret posting the article, but at least there was some good discussion of how bad it is.