After a day and several replies from people. I’ve come to the conclusion that people here are ok with their party and leaders supporting genocide and they attack the questioners (instead of their party leaders) who criticize those who support genocide. Critical thinking is scarce here.

I’m shameful of humanity.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    -14 hours ago

    It’s explained nearly every time this comes up.

    It’s so disheartening to see society descend into this monolithic, unthinking, blob.

    An argument doesn’t become an ‘explanation’ just because you agree with it.

    People have made their case. I’ve disagreed with it and given reasons. That’s how rational debate works (or at least it used to in better times).

    What’s happening here is people are disagreeing about a matter and exchanging reason why they reached their differing conclusion.

    It’s not one party ‘explaining’ some fact to another. It’s not maths, people disagree. Experts disagree. It’s an open question still.

    • @WrenFeathersM
      link
      1
      edit-2
      2 hours ago

      Some things are empirical. Like… throwing away your vote on third parties- and how protest votes are batshit stupid.

        • @WrenFeathersM
          link
          1
          edit-2
          2 hours ago

          No it means absolute truth- as in, it’s an absolute truth that a protest vote is stupid.

          … we’re done here