• ⓝⓞ🅞🅝🅔
    link
    fedilink
    English
    278 hours ago

    I really, really wish the linked article explained more. What are they playing at? This is such a confusing level of control.

      • Obinice
        link
        English
        117 hours ago

        Okay but what about the image cast on our retinas through our eyeballs that we use to see?

        Those are imperfect imitations of reality also. What’s their stance on those images…

      • snooggums
        link
        English
        87 hours ago

        But apparently written religious works or talking about god’s work is perfect, or that would be banned too.

    • I Cast Fist
      link
      fedilink
      English
      65 hours ago

      According to wikipedia, that isn’t even a problem within the Quran itself, but rather a hadith (oral tradition) from some other fellow: “Sahih Bukhari explicitly prohibits the making of images of living beings, challenging painters to “breathe life” into their images and threatening them with punishment on the Day of Judgment.”

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      138 hours ago

      God doesn’t want you to mix fabrics or eat certain foods on certain days. “Confusing level of control” is on brand.

      It’s not about making sense though. It’s about making you do what they want so that you know who is in control.

      • snooggums
        link
        English
        11
        edit-2
        5 hours ago

        Not mixing fabrics and certain food practices were originally based on lived experience, like safety guidance, before getting coopted by religion. Kosher practices avoid cross contamination, and mixed fabrics could have something to do with temperature regulation in desert areas where it swings between extreme heat and cold daily. Or it could have existed to discourage lying about prodict quality by those who would sneak in poor quality materials.

        When religion got ahold of these concepts they were absolutely twisted into controlling people.