South Korea says it has detected preparations by North Korea to blow up its sections of inter-Korean roads. Tensions have been soaring between the two countries in recent weeks.

South Korean officials said on Monday that they had gathered intelligence indicating that the North was preparing to demolish its half of roads that connect the two countries.

“They have installed screens on the road and are working behind those screens, preparing to blow up the roads,” Lee Sung Joon, a spokesperson for South Korea’s Joint Chiefs of Staff, told reporters.

He said the operation could take place as soon as Monday.

The move follows weeks of soaring tensions on the Korean peninsula. North Korea has accused South Korea of using drones to drop propaganda leaflets over its territory three times, and threatened to respond with force if it happens again.

  • Flying SquidM
    link
    English
    152 months ago

    Dude, getting rid of some roads isn’t going to start WWIII.

    North Korea probably just needs money again and they ran out of rockets to shoot into the ocean, which is what they usually do when they need money.

    • @InverseParallax
      link
      English
      52 months ago

      It’s not, but I don’t think it’s money.

      Putin told kju the west was weak, and now was the time to strike, just like he told Xi in 2022.

      Kju will posture because he isn’t sure whether to believe or not, and mildly ratting his saber covers all eventualities.

      Iran was similar, as was Hamas, putin is pushing for maximum instability in hopes that the west will decide supporting Ukraine is too risky.

      The problem is: we’ve see this all before, appeasement doesn’t bring peace, it just encourages more war.

      This is really part of Putin’s whole contingency plan of forming a counter to nato, with all the worst outcasts and China, because he figured half the world would rally around him after kyiv fell.

      • Flying SquidM
        link
        English
        32 months ago

        Rally around him or at least be Neville Chamberlains. He’s mostly gotten the latter from the minority of nations not condemning him and very little of the former.

        • @InverseParallax
          link
          English
          32 months ago

          Tbf to him, from his vantage point the fall of Afghanistan did seem like the signal to strike.

          He just vastly underestimated the underlying strength of the west because we basically exaggerate our capabilities far less than he’s used to under vranyo, so our minor defeat wasn’t actually a sign of us hiding our complete collapse.

          • @NotMyOldRedditName
            link
            English
            32 months ago

            fall of Afghanistan

            You mean the fall that he orchestrated via trump?

            If you want to consider that the start, Putin started it.

            • @InverseParallax
              link
              English
              22 months ago

              Heh, I agree, much like he contributed massively to Brexit.

              But understand this: In this story, he’s the main character, he sees things a bit differently, for him re-uniting the Russian Empire is a matter of destiny and anything that helps was meant to be, while any setbacks must be sabotage of the natural way by the evil and petty western powers.

              That’s just how things look at that level, it’s why dictatorships are bad, they reinforce narcissistic blindness.

    • @Warl0k3
      link
      English
      52 months ago

      Seems like being stressed out over two nuclear powers (even if one of them has the tinkertoy equivalent of an arsenal…) playing geopolitical chicken isn’t the most unreasonable reaction I could have.

      • Flying SquidM
        link
        English
        42 months ago

        Then I wouldn’t look into this issue too deeply or you will be eternally stressed.

        • @Warl0k3
          link
          English
          22 months ago

          You’re not wrong - Ignorance is, rather famously, bliss.

          • Flying SquidM
            link
            English
            2
            edit-2
            2 months ago

            My point is that this sort of thing has been regularly happening with North Korea for years. And far more aggressive acts too. This is not the end of it all.

            Edit: Also, South Korea has no nuclear weapons, so this isn’t between two nuclear powers.

            • abff08f4813c
              link
              fedilink
              22 months ago

              Agreed - NK likes to saber rattle a lot. This is just more of the same.

              One thing I have to begrudingly admit - they are really smart at approaching the edge of the line (to a nation ending war), without crossing it.

              Also, it’s true that South Korea is not a nuclear armed State, but I can see why NK might sometimes feel like the opposite. South Korea hosts nukes from the US (for the defense of Korea) and is under the nuclear umbrella of the US (where the US promises to use nuclear weapons to defend South Korea if it’s attacked by a nuclear armed opponent).

              More saliently, South Korea has successfully launched into outer space - this is the same rocket technology needed to launch an ICBM. So even if the US broke away, South Korea could go nuclear very quickly.

              These are all part of NK’s calculation when it considers how far it’s willing to go in saber rattling.

            • @Warl0k3
              link
              English
              12 months ago

              Did I say somewhere I thought this was going to turn into WWIII, or that this would be the end of it all? No, I said it was yet another extremely stressful thing to heap onto the pile. You’re inventing what I said and arguing against that.
              (The united states was the 2nd nuclear power to which I was referring. There are ample US nuclear assets stationed in KR.)

                • @Warl0k3
                  link
                  English
                  2
                  edit-2
                  2 months ago

                  From your article:

                  Under the new deal, the US will make its defense commitments more visible by sending a nuclear-armed submarine to South Korea for the first time in 40 years, along with other strategic assets, including nuclear-capable bombers.

                  Dude, squiddy, even a single Ohio class submarine could wipe out half the life on this planet. I get you think I haven’t understood your message, and maybe you think this is somehow helpful instead of incredibly patronizing, but it’s concerning that the moderator of a news community doesn’t understand that news can be both important to read and at the same time deeply stressful.

                  • Flying SquidM
                    link
                    English
                    -22 months ago

                    but it’s concerning that the moderator of a news community doesn’t understand that news can be both important to read and at the same time deeply stressful.

                    1. My job as a moderator is to enforce the rules in the sidebar. Those rules do not involve such things.
                    2. It’s because I recognize this is stressful that I literally have said things like, “then I wouldn’t look into this issue too deeply or you will be eternally stressed” and “so, again, maybe this isn’t worth getting so worried about.” I have no idea why you would think I would say those two things to you but not understand that it can be stressful.

                    I have been attempting to explain why this should not stress you out so much. I guess that makes me a bad moderator.