• 2ugly2live
    link
    102 months ago

    In your example, their solution is absolutely being a murderer. They didn’t pull the trigger, but they condemned those people to death. They know that refusing is killing those people, that their refusal is the cause for those peoples deaths. I’m not saying that I don’t think Gaza is important, or that it’s not worth fighting for, but I extend that same importance to my countrymen as well. I think the woman who may need an abortion is important, even if I never get one. I think that my neighbor’s kids should have a save school, and not be laden I’m debt, even thought I don’t plan to have children.

    I cannot stop what’s going on in Gaza. It’s a horrible, terribly bitter pill to swallow, but it is the truth. However, I’m not going to set everyone else on fire so we can all burn together in solidarity. Too many other people’s lives are at stake. And I’m not saying their lives are more important than those in Gaza, I’m saying they’re just as important. Kill one person, or kill everyone. I would rather save someone than no one.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      -62 months ago

      Exactly, you think being a murderer is okay.

      That is the core philosophical difference.

      You are completely okay with killing innocent people. These people are not, normal people are not.

      This difference cannot be reconciled. These people will never think the way you do, and thank every God ever imagined for that, as someone needs to be the moral party if only as an example of how normalized and justified pure evil is.

      • 2ugly2live
        link
        112 months ago

        That’s not at all what I said, and I think you know that. Wanting to help someone is not the same as wanting to kill someone else. My vote doesn’t save Gaza, because there is unfortunately no option, but my vote could still help someone. Not voting, or throwing it away, literally doesn’t help anyone.

        I hope you find peace with your indecision and your cowardice should the rest of the country not be able to make up for your inactivity. But I’m sure those suffering in Gaza will feel better knowing that someone in Texas is bleeding out in the parking lot. That’ll show 'em.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        02 months ago

        Fucking ridiculous.

        A vote for anyone OTHER than Harris directly results in MORE Gazan suffering.

        Trump will not restrain Israel. On the contrary, he will encourage them to ‘end it’ and achieve “peace” by ACTUALLY genociding all remaining Palestine resistance.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          -12 months ago

          There already has been no restraint from Biden. Genocide is genocide, and Harris supports genocide.

          I’m not voting for genocide, there is no moral argument to do so.

        • @sorval_the_eeter
          link
          -1
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          restrain Israel

          Are you really so deluded to beleive all of Bidens play acting about how he was seeking peace all this time? He used 0% of his levers to make peace happen and 100% of his levers to encourage Israels murder spree.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        -12 months ago

        How are you not a murder in your role play here? By doing nothing everyone dies, that blood is ALSO on your hands for inaction.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          -12 months ago

          Because it was a trick. You are being tricked by the voice that you are responsible for minimizing the harm they choose to inflict on the three people in the room, if that threat is even real in the first place.

          So to choose to murder anyone or kill yourself is a ridiculous position and most wouldnt take it. The voice will have to be the murderer here if thats what they want.

          Or you can believe the voice without question, and kill one of the people based on some arbitrary metric you come up with on the spot to justify you choosing to kill someone.

          So in this case, people are believing the lie, then choosing “the lesser of two evils” based on some arbitrary metric like “which ones better for the economy, since they both are genocidal”.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          -32 months ago

          I’m not the one murdering them, quite literally. Just like in real life, there is no mystical unstoppable force of nature in play. It’s another person, like you. Their choices aren’t your choices.

          To put it another way, if you sold a kid a bike and he later crashes and dies despite the bike having no faults, are you responsible? Most would correctly identify that you are not responsible in that scenario, as the kid is responsible for what they did with the bike.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            22 months ago

            In this case your entire argument about the election is moot. If I vote for a president, their actions are not mine, I am not going to Gaza to kill Palestinians. You can even go a step further, neither Harris nor trump is personally going to Gaza to kill people. The choice of killing Palestinians is up to the Israeli people who are doing the actual killing.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              -12 months ago

              The opposite. If your vote for a president their actions are yours. You endorsed and aides them.