• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    -81 month ago

    I don’t think Anton was outright evil. I don’t think you consider yourself evil for swatting a fly. To Anton people who crossed him were no different than flies to be swatted. And of course killing (or trying to kill) some people, like Moss, were just part of the job. He was simply violent because it was in his nature.

    • @qarbone
      link
      English
      301 month ago

      I think “killing people like they were flies” disqualifies you from anything above “neutral” on the morality chart, like pretty handily too.

    • @steeznson
      link
      English
      61 month ago

      In the book Anton is a personification of human evil as a natural force a bit like The Judge in Blood Meridian. The film is more ambiguous I think mainly due to the medium making the character more human by being played by an actor.

    • @WaxedWookie
      link
      English
      61 month ago

      I think it’s safe to say that this is a pretty incomprehensible standard for most. Could you explain what would make him evil? Viewing people as people, for example?

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        61 month ago

        I guess I should add that I made the comment because of the comparison between Todd and Anton. I found it odd to call Anton “outright evil” as if that’s some distinction between Todd and Anton. Anton is no more or less evil than Todd. The only difference is that Anton was more violent due to the nature of his profession.

        • @WaxedWookie
          link
          English
          41 month ago

          Gotcha - that’s an understandable, relative position I think I can agree with based on my memory of both characters and portrayals.

          …Absent this clarification, it was looking as though you might belong in the same bucket as them.