A battalion of 3,000 North Korean soldiers will shortly join Russian troops in fighting Ukraine, marking Pyongyang’s full entry into the war.

Intelligence sources said the unit has been secretly training in Russia’s Far East ahead of deployment as part of a Russian airborne regiment.

“They are called the Buryat Battalion,” a senior Ukrainian military source told Politico. Buryatia is a remote region of Russia bordering Mongolia that the Kremlin has targeted heavily for military recruitment.

The Kyiv Independent quoted another Western intelligence source claiming that North Korea had sent 10,000 soldiers to join the Russian army.

(…)

  • @HomerianSymphony
    link
    English
    -18
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    Another story I saw says that North Korean troops were spotted in the Russian military. How could an observer know they were Korean? Were they wearing a Korean uniform? And if so, why haven’t we seen any photos of that? Ukrainians have cameras, right?

    Is this just a case of Ukrainians not being able to tell the difference between Buryats and Koreans?

    Edit: Come to think of it, it’s more likely a case of Americans not being able to tell the difference between Buryats and Koreans.

    I can only imagine their shock when they eventually learn that Russia, a country that spans all of north Asia, has Asians in it.

    • @HomerianSymphony
      link
      English
      -131 month ago

      Part of me thinks “Surely American military intelligence must know there are different ethnic groups in Russia”.

      But then I remember how the invasion of Iraq happened in part because the Americans didn’t understand the difference between Shia and Sunni Iraqis.

      • @Valmond
        link
        English
        61 month ago

        Removed by mod

        • @HomerianSymphony
          link
          English
          -6
          edit-2
          1 month ago

          I sometimes think of something to say after my original comment.

          And is “comrade” supposed to be a dig of some kind? Because it isn’t.

          • @Valmond
            link
            English
            21 month ago

            Oh that’s why you reported my post. I just thought you were a communist tankie.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        5
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        The US understands very well the different religious factions. The way the West Asia region was carved into countries by the colonial powers is identical to what they did in Africa. Deliberately creating countries with internal conflicts that can be exploited for destabilizing them.

        However it is easy to tell apart Siberian ethnicities from Koreans. You can also tell apart Eastern Europeans from Western Europeans, leave alone the fact that Korean is an entirely different language from Russian or the languages of the region.

        Edit: regarding the languages. In Buryat people speak dialects of Mongolian. Mongolian has a shared ancestry with Turk languages.

        https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mongolic_languages

            • @HomerianSymphony
              link
              English
              -21 month ago

              I know. I’m not the one who claimed Turkish is related to Mogolian. The other guy said that.

              Did you respond to the wrong person?

              • Flying SquidM
                link
                English
                -21 month ago

                You both seemed to be in agreement on that, so…

                  • Flying SquidM
                    link
                    English
                    2
                    edit-2
                    1 month ago

                    That was absolutely not clear from this brief comment:

                    [EDIT: Comment has been deleted.]

                    So you’re saying your comment was just violating our incivility rule?

          • @HomerianSymphony
            link
            English
            -6
            edit-2
            1 month ago

            What’s with the downvotes? Are you all Altaicists here?

            Who would have thought the worst thing about Lemmy was all the bad linguistics theories.

            Edit: Oh, come to think of it, I guess bad anthropological theories are a bit of a staple of American reactionaries.