@[email protected]M to Science [email protected]English • 16 hours agoThe 1900smander.xyzimagemessage-square102fedilinkarrow-up11.11Karrow-down17
arrow-up11.1Karrow-down1imageThe 1900smander.xyz@[email protected]M to Science [email protected]English • 16 hours agomessage-square102fedilink
minus-squareu/lukmly013 💾 (lemmy.sdf.org)linkfedilinkEnglish6•edit-211 hours agoI rather meant how it sounds. It’s in the “hundreds”. Two thousands. Twenty hundreds. “Early twenty hundreds” does kind of make it sound like we live in 2224 instead while “early two thousands” sounds like 2002. I could have written it better.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish6•10 hours agoWell you also wouldn’t say ten hundreds for the 1000’s. I think it’s just a quirk of the being the first century in a millennia.
I rather meant how it sounds. It’s in the “hundreds”.
Two thousands.
Twenty hundreds.
“Early twenty hundreds” does kind of make it sound like we live in 2224 instead while “early two thousands” sounds like 2002.
I could have written it better.
Well you also wouldn’t say ten hundreds for the 1000’s. I think it’s just a quirk of the being the first century in a millennia.