• @jordanlund
    link
    22 hours ago

    The whole Looper premise doesn’t make sense.

    Criminals in the future send people back in time to get whacked. If you get an abnormally large payout, that means you whacked your future self and are now retired.

    Why have someone kill themselves with a large payoff? Why retire them? If they’re retired in the future, why have them killed?

    You have present day hitmen, A, B, and C. Future victims, a, b, and c.

    A -> a, B -> b, C -> c results in stupid large payouts and retired killers.

    A -> b, B -> c, C -> a has normal payoffs and no retirements.

    Still doesn’t explain why you wanted a, b, and c dead in the first place.

    Looper is a great LOOKING movie, those shotguns were on point! Just don’t go thinking about it for more than 5 minutes.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      115 minutes ago

      Their concept of time travel is definitely unorthodox compared to other time travel movies. One of the main characters literally said not to think too much about it.

      Everything else was pretty much explained by the protag.

      He did mentioned that his line of work doesn’t attract forward thinking people. This is quite realistic, I mean, have you seen how a lot of people (and companies) sacrificed long term benefits for short ter ones? It’s also posible that they think they can beat that system.

      Their future selves are killed to tie up loose ends. The change in power dynamic with Rainmaker’s takeover definitely plays a role. This is actually a common trope in crime dramas (and probably also in real world).

      It definitely is not a perfect movie, but it’s a damn good one to me. I definitely think Joseph-Gorden Lewitt and Emily Blunt lack chemistry, and the sex scene was forced, but I guess it’s somewhat realistic someone living in a farm out of nowhere all by themselves can get so horny…