• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    30
    edit-2
    24 hours ago

    It’s a bold move but I don’t see it changing the outcome of the ongoing war. If Ukraine could build long-range ballistic missiles in the near future, I think they could regain the advantage even without any nuclear warheads. Nuclear warheads would not be useful without those ballistic missiles.

    (What would happen if Ukraine did have nuclear-armed ballistic missiles but Russia refused to withdraw from Ukrainian territory? I don’t foresee Ukraine actually nuking Russia, even in those circumstances.)

    • nukeM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      34
      edit-2
      22 hours ago

      Man fuck these comments, nuke Russia you pussies. I’ll deliver the missiles myself if that’s what you need. Strap me to the rocket and fire me at Moscow!

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      3723 hours ago

      A truck can deliver a nuke. Just pack it in cat litter and drive it onto that bridge in Crimea. Should knock that stupid thing out finally.

    • @Passerby6497
      link
      English
      1821 hours ago

      Fuck it, give them a Davy Crocket and then you don’t need no stinkin’ ballistic missiles.

    • @brucethemoose
      link
      English
      6
      edit-2
      20 hours ago

      Just package it as a good old gravity bomb or glide bomb?

      Or get creative and mount it on a swarm of large drones (with the others being decoys for SAMs). Maybe like a fleet of old prop planes flying very low.

      This is very hypothetical though, no one should hope for Ukraine reaching the point of even considering an actual launch of a nuke.