@[email protected]M to Ranked Choice [email protected] • 3 months agoIt’s nearly unanimous: The political elite don’t like ranked-choice votingthenevadaindependent.comexternal-linkmessage-square17fedilinkarrow-up1210arrow-down11file-text
arrow-up1209arrow-down1external-linkIt’s nearly unanimous: The political elite don’t like ranked-choice votingthenevadaindependent.com@[email protected]M to Ranked Choice [email protected] • 3 months agomessage-square17fedilinkfile-text
Here you go, here’s an olive branch to the “both sides” people. It sounds like, in Nevada, you are correct.
minus-square@[email protected]OPMlinkfedilink14•3 months agoIt seems like a great thing, but I support unifying behind one big reform idea that’s gaining traction and has name recognition, over splitting the energy too much to things that aren’t on the ballot coming up right now.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink3•edit-23 months agoOpen list PR would be harder to shoehorn onto current legislation (mostly to do with single member districts) and hence less politically viable.
Open List Proportional Representation.
It seems like a great thing, but I support unifying behind one big reform idea that’s gaining traction and has name recognition, over splitting the energy too much to things that aren’t on the ballot coming up right now.
Open list PR would be harder to shoehorn onto current legislation (mostly to do with single member districts) and hence less politically viable.