• @rockSlayer
    link
    -81 day ago

    Not the same person, but my vote is for nothing. No government. Maybe a national workers council during the transition to no government. Before you ask, no capitalism either. Just a library economy with production managed by worker-led unions

    • @draneceusrex
      link
      61 day ago

      I told you! We’re an anarcho-syndicalist commune! We’re taking turns to act as a sort of executive-officer-for-the-week–

      • @rockSlayer
        link
        -11 day ago

        Funny you reference that, because I’m actually an anarcho-syndicalist and that’s actually the system I want to replace our government with (not as described in the skit, but still) The joke is good, but the politics are better

        • @draneceusrex
          link
          31 day ago

          No, I got it. Hence the quote. It’s an interesting system, but not sure how it would scale, especially in terms of defense. On a local level I do like the idea, though adapting to modern systems of globalization would be challenging too.

          • @rockSlayer
            link
            31 day ago

            That’s fair, it’s relatively unattempted as far as political systems go. However I think it’s pretty promising based on the anarchist communes out there and the success of the CNT during the Spanish revolution

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      31 day ago

      It kind of sounds like a confederacy. Also, each union would have its leadership with someone or a few at the top, so what you’re advocating for is a confederation of smaller governing bodies, yes?

      Also, this isn’t a gotcha, but how would you ensure certain unions don’t take advantage of their market position? Would there still be national regulatory bodies?

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        321 hours ago

        Also, each union would have its leadership with someone or a few at the top

        Ideally, there wouldn’t be someone like a representative or president at the top

      • @rockSlayer
        link
        21 day ago

        I think you’re imagining these unions to be bigger than what they would be. A library economy is where all nonperishable goods are exchanged at a library. There’s no market to be positioned in. Each union represents their workplace, and these unions coordinate their production to meet the mutual needs of both communities. The unions have a very narrow scope, limited to what the workers produce and have the right of free association. The work needed to protect the environment would be managed by the entire community based on their ability to do so.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          41 day ago

          I guess I don’t understand how they wouldn’t grow to large size. And I still don’t understand what oversight ensures the Library(s) has safe goods (since history has shown that some people are cut from selfish cloth).

          Is there anything I can read to learn more about your position? I don’t think I grasp it from your short explanation

          • @gdog05
            link
            01 day ago

            If you’re implying that a union that makes food will have more power than a union making secondary or luxury goods, well, yeah. You’re totally right that’s exactly what would happen. But, it’s all equal because they both have 873 members.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              31 day ago

              I mean, even if we accept the premise that all products are inherently equal in value, who is making sure the leadership or the union more generally is acting in good faith?

              I like the general outline, but I’m struggling to envision how it prevents capitalism from working its way into what look to be, from my lay-perspective, proto-corporations.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                217 hours ago

                Introducing “value” is already the start of the slippery slope towards capitalism, IMHO.

                Ithink a lot would be already gained if you have a usufruct system of commons.

              • @gdog05
                link
                21 day ago

                I was being facetious. I personally don’t feel like that is a workable system. Don’t get me wrong, neither is capitalism at the scale it’s at, especially. I’ve not seen a system that I think would work beyond a state level.