• @abbotsbury
    link
    111 month ago

    That doesn’t address what they said at all.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        16
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        This should be the response to the comment from @[email protected]

        Did Jill Stein disavow the endorsement? Stein’s campaign says it wants nothing to do with the former American Nazi Party member.

        According to herself it doesn’t mean it isn’t concerning or that she didn’t earn it!

        • @sorval_the_eeter
          link
          4
          edit-2
          1 month ago

          Yes, the third page of Google search says she did immediately. We should all be ask ourselves why and how this fact has been hidden in the conversations about this. Again, I’m not a Jill stein supporter, and I dont know if she’s a Russian puppet. attending a RT dinner is suspicious, assuming people and media outlets arent just lying about what the event was about. If true its disqualifying in my book. But this David Duke thing that you are accusing her of, she clearly isnt guilty of in the way you see it.

          "Jill Stein

          October 15 at 1:03 PM ·

          A racist troll has “endorsed” our campaign to draw attention to himself, and certain smear merchants are happy to platform this troll to attack us. Of course, I reject any “endorsement” from a white supremacist like David Duke, unlike Kamala Harris who can’t stop bragging about her endorsement from white supremacist mass murderer Dick Cheney."

          https://www.facebook.com/story.php?story_fbid=1094219788739543&id=100044545954739&_rdr

    • @BigPotato
      link
      61 month ago

      Their last line is “we don’t need to be making shit up” and the above poster showed that it was factual. It does address one part.

      Not the first part about the mechanics of the endorsement but the final part, implying it’s a lie that David Duke endorsed Jill Stein for president.