• archomrade [he/him]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    -12
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    I think it has more to do with Macron and his bedding of right-wing fascists to avoid a left-wing government coalition

    That, and their funding of religious ethnostate terrorists…

    Edit: i don’t get it, is it something I said?

    Edit 2: OK, I was wrong about the specific context of the comment, but I’ll take partial credit for guessing it had to do with the war in Gaza

    • @[email protected]OPM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      221 month ago

      Yes, the dislike of a democratically elected leader is reasonable clause to call for innocent french people to die in a massacre

      • archomrade [he/him]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        -91 month ago

        I didn’t say it was reasonable, I was only answering the question as to why they were angry with France.

        I think what the west deserves for funding a genocidal fascist is entirely up for debate, but that they deserve something is pretty well justified, IMHO

        • @[email protected]OPM
          link
          fedilink
          English
          8
          edit-2
          1 month ago

          I think what the west deserves for funding a genocidal fascist is entirely up for debate, but that they deserve something is pretty well justified, IMHO

          Are you trying to say the West deserves violence? Advocating for violence isn’t allowed in this community or instance.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            -31 month ago

            Maybe the west should lay off the fucking violence themselves and not bleat when it gets dished back to them once in a while.

            • @[email protected]OPM
              link
              fedilink
              English
              51 month ago

              The West? All of the West? You hear that New Zealand?! You cowards!

              But legitimately, ‘dished back to them?’ – Not very pro-peace of you. Violence begets violence. You should aim for peace, not more war.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                English
                01 month ago

                Point to on the doll where I was advocating violence.

                The reading comprehension of people nowadays is shockingly poor because if it was better, you would have grasped that I was pointing out that it’s fairly hypocritical to go around being a cunt to other countries then cry like a fucking baby when they do the same shit back to you.

                • @[email protected]OPM
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  11 month ago

                  Maybe the west should lay off the fucking violence themselves and not bleat when it gets dished back to them once in a while.

                  I was pointing out that it’s fairly hypocritical to go around being a cunt to other countries then cry like a fucking baby when they do the same shit back to you.

                  The reading comprehension of people nowadays is shockingly poor

            • @[email protected]OPM
              link
              fedilink
              English
              151 month ago

              And what will this justice be? Because the post is saying a massacre.

              I think it’s pretty telling you were advocating for violence, and now you’re forced to backtrack.

              • archomrade [he/him]
                link
                fedilink
                English
                -91 month ago

                I wasn’t advocating for anything, I was answering the question about why they were angry with the french.

                And what will this justice be?

                If it were me, i’d say the west should face international sanction and prosecution in the Hague for all leaders/diplomats accused of willfully collaborating with a genocide. Of course, a western-controlled criminal court would never do such a thing, so I guess all we have is BDS and public protest.

                • @[email protected]OPM
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  11
                  edit-2
                  1 month ago

                  You italicised something. Implying violence as per the post.

                  International sanctions? How would that even work? You can’t sanction over half the world, let alone prosecute them. Why does New Zealand get sanctioned? Why Europe? Why Canada? What about countries that are collaborating in the Ukraine-Russia war? How about congo?

                  This is a fantasy

                  • archomrade [he/him]
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    -91 month ago

                    I italicized something because I believe the west (including France, in this case) does deserve some kind of punishment for their crimes against Palestine. Obviously I don’t think countries who had nothing to do with this genocide need be punished, but at this point much of the western world has enabled it either by direct material contribution or by a failure to boycott, divest, or sanction Israel for their crimes.

                    It’s not up to me to decide what that justice is or how it’s administered, but I don’t think there’s any arguing that there shouldn’t be some measure of justice for Palestine. Unless you believe Israel has done nothing wrong…?

                    This is a fantasy

                    Yup, that’s all we have, because as you alluded to: this is the west’s global hegemony, we’re just living in it.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          31 month ago

          I didn’t say it was reasonable

          This is true, and we’ll all let you continue to hide behind what you say directly while you are here defending the stance “of which you didn’t directly state”.

          Take your doublespeak elsewhere 🤷