• @Nurgus
    link
    3
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    “Revolution only ever results in a change of masters”

    “One does not establish a dictatorship in order to safeguard a revolution; one makes the revolution in order to establish the dictatorship.”

      • @Nurgus
        link
        128 days ago

        Slavery finished, replaced with forced labour and serfdom? That Haiti?

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          128 days ago

          I’m not sure why you’re arguing in favour of literal slavery, but ok. There are other examples:

          • Bavaria in 1919
          • Spain with the CNT/FAI in the 1930s
          • The 1905 revolution in Russia, along with the 1917 revolution
          • @Nurgus
            link
            128 days ago

            I’m not arguing for slavery, you’re misunderstanding the quote. I didn’t say the change of masters was inherently no better than the previous masters.

            Revolution is always, in every example, a doorway for powerhungry authoritarians to swoop in.

            The fact that Haitians were eventually much better off than as slaves doesn’t change that.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              128 days ago

              Revolution is always, in every example, a doorway for powerhungry authoritarians to swoop in.

              I disagree. Like I said: CNT/FAI Catalonia, 1919 Bavaria and anarchist Ukraine are counterexamples.

              If a revolution is thorough enough to eradicate the hierarchical structure of oppression, it doesn’t have to be used by authoritarians.