@[email protected]M to [email protected]English • 11 hours agoUpon being criticised for their support of the Charlie Hebdo terrorist attacks, tankies unsurprisingly double downsh.itjust.worksimagemessage-square21fedilinkarrow-up132arrow-down11
arrow-up131arrow-down1imageUpon being criticised for their support of the Charlie Hebdo terrorist attacks, tankies unsurprisingly double downsh.itjust.works@[email protected]M to [email protected]English • 11 hours agomessage-square21fedilink
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish7•10 hours agoI’ve seen how they behave on other instances, no way will they be polite and courteous when someone disagrees with them on home turf.
minus-squarearchomrade [he/him]linkfedilinkEnglish-4•9 hours agoYou just gotta know which things you disagree on, and why they might strongly disagree with you, and not just say “fuck it, imma blast off”. If you go in wanting to make a point then yea. They will not be courteous.
minus-square@[email protected]OPMlinkfedilinkEnglish8•edit-28 hours agoAh, love this. ‘They’re fine if you supply evidence to back up your claims’ ‘Actually if you try to do that then you’ll be booted’
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish5•8 hours agoPoor thing’s got no idea how stupid they sound.
I’ve seen how they behave on other instances, no way will they be polite and courteous when someone disagrees with them on home turf.
You just gotta know which things you disagree on, and why they might strongly disagree with you, and not just say “fuck it, imma blast off”.
If you go in wanting to make a point then yea. They will not be courteous.
Ah, love this.
‘They’re fine if you supply evidence to back up your claims’
‘Actually if you try to do that then you’ll be booted’
Poor thing’s got no idea how stupid they sound.