Five to UK [email protected]English • 2 months agoGay man rejected for asylum by Home Office told he is 'not truly gay' by judgemetro.co.ukexternal-linkmessage-square52fedilinkarrow-up1112arrow-down15cross-posted to: [email protected]
arrow-up1107arrow-down1external-linkGay man rejected for asylum by Home Office told he is 'not truly gay' by judgemetro.co.ukFive to UK [email protected]English • 2 months agomessage-square52fedilinkcross-posted to: [email protected]
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink25•2 months agoI’m not saying he should have to, but is there a reason he can’t just submit, “video evidence”
minus-square@Maaluslink26•2 months agoWas there ever a hetero person seeking asylum that had to give their sex tape to a shitty official?
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink7•2 months agoI don’t think heterosexuals are persecuted anywhere, that’s not a valid equivalence. Not that I find the idea of making porn to prove your sexual orientation morally fine.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink2•2 months agoHence the “I’m not saying he should have to”. To clarify, I’m asking if there’s some rule or law of evidence that prevents someone doing that.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink14•edit-22 months ago“You don’t look like you’re enjoying it enough”
I’m not saying he should have to, but is there a reason he can’t just submit, “video evidence”
Was there ever a hetero person seeking asylum that had to give their sex tape to a shitty official?
I mean probably yeah.
I don’t think heterosexuals are persecuted anywhere, that’s not a valid equivalence. Not that I find the idea of making porn to prove your sexual orientation morally fine.
Hence the “I’m not saying he should have to”. To clarify, I’m asking if there’s some rule or law of evidence that prevents someone doing that.
Yeah, the basic laws for privacy.
“You don’t look like you’re enjoying it enough”