• @Jackthelad
    link
    English
    429 days ago

    It’s an expensive gimmick.

    Like 3D TVs.

    • Shirasho
      link
      fedilink
      English
      2529 days ago

      Unlike 3d tvs it actually has something to offer. I wouldn’t call it a gimmick, but it definitely has a price barrier that is hard to swallow.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        1729 days ago

        It’s all closed source trash. No one wants to get stuck with a $500 paperweight if meta decides to alter the deal further.

        • moonlight
          link
          fedilink
          929 days ago

          Yeah I used to have an old Windows MR headset until it stopped working (and I switched to linux)

          It was a lot of fun, and I do miss beat saber.

          But I’m not going to spend a thousand dollars on an outdated index, or put facebook spyware on my face. If Valve or some other company comes out with something modern without proprietary bs, I’d buy it in a heartbeat.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            229 days ago

            Yup and hopefully untethered. The thought of being attached by a cord to my most expensive appliance would never let me be fully immersed

        • Shirasho
          link
          fedilink
          English
          229 days ago

          Whether it is closed source or not is irrelevant to this discussion. The fact of the matter is that VR offers a different gaming experience, one that has the opportunity to provide real exercise for the player.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            128 days ago

            If it did someone would have come out with an actual good game for it in the decade or so it has been around by now.

            • Tarquinn2049
              link
              English
              028 days ago

              What game would you finally consider good? Do you even know what people play in VR? There are literally thousands of games. I personally own 250 from over the 10 years, and that’s me holding back. There are so many more that I wanted to play if I had more time to do so.

              And even outside of bespoke VR games, a VR headset is an awesome monitor replacement now for your regular computer games too. My Virtual monitor is 4k 120hz, that I can use while sitting in a recliner.

      • @theunknownmuncher
        link
        English
        329 days ago

        They’re like $300 now. Cheaper than a console, 1/3 the cost of an iPhone, 1/6 the cost of a gaming laptop…

        • Flamekebab
          link
          fedilink
          929 days ago

          I still cannot fathom how anyone justifies paying so much for phones. My most recent one was a Pixel 4A, £100. I’ve not seen anything exciting in a smartphone in a decade or more.

          • Tarquinn2049
            link
            English
            2
            edit-2
            29 days ago

            Generally for gaming. It’s like PCs, you can totally get by with a 100 dollar second hand computer… unless you want to play a game made this year.

            Typing this on a 120hz 4k gaming phone.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              129 days ago

              I don’t even play games on my phone but 120hz is INCREDIBLE. I’m so happy my phone is finally a high refresh rate display.

              • Tarquinn2049
                link
                English
                329 days ago

                Hehe yeah, nice added benefits to everything, but ourside of gaming it would be hard to justify the price of a high-end phone. Heck even with gaming it can still be hard, lol.

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  128 days ago

                  What kind of games can you even control with a touch screen where refresh rate matters that much?

                  • Tarquinn2049
                    link
                    English
                    -128 days ago

                    Fps matters for everything, 120 fps is just the new normal, can’t go back. When we used to play games at 15 fps and the new normal became 30, we couldn’t go back, 15 fps looked so bad once you got used to seeing stuff at 30 fps. Same for 60 fps in it’s day, and 120 fps now.

                    If you haven’t gotten used to 120 fps yet, and you want to save money, put it off as long as you can. You won’t be able to go back.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            129 days ago

            Mainly camera, nice screen, and longevity. I went from an iPhone XS Max that’s over six years old to a like 1600USD iPhone 16 Pro Max that I’ll probably have for six years. I’m in my phone all the time so I want something fast, 120hz screen is amazing, and super high quality low light pictures of my cats are amazing.

            • Tarquinn2049
              link
              English
              329 days ago

              Yeah true, not having to switch phones every couple years is a plus. I don’t do contract, just buy the phone I want and pick the network I want to use it with. Then use that phone for as long as I can stand to. Eventually the upgrade is positive enough to outweigh having to get used to the physicalities of a new phone. New muscle memory, especially for typing on a screen based keyboard is so annoying.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                English
                129 days ago

                Completely agree! I don’t fault anyone for buying less expensive phones—1600 is an insane amount of money for a pocket rectangle. But I justify it as, I use it more than six hours every day, and it has replaced my DSLR. And I’ll have to for five or six years! It’s nice to have a fancy!

      • snooggums
        link
        English
        229 days ago

        A slightly more useful gimmick.

    • @theunknownmuncher
      link
      English
      8
      edit-2
      29 days ago

      Thought this too until I was gifted a headset, and found out I was dead wrong.

      Btw they genuinely aren’t even that expensive anymore. Cheaper than a console, a phone is 3x the cost, and a gaming laptop 6x the cost.

      • @Telstarado
        link
        English
        1
        edit-2
        29 days ago

        I love the shit out of mine. Got the VrCover face pieces which keep sweat from being a problem. I mainly play heavily modded Skyrim VR and a few different exercise games. My son plays a ton of different games with his friends. I don’t think they are for everyone, but not a gimmick IMO.

    • dindonmasker
      link
      fedilink
      English
      229 days ago

      Medical training in VR isn’t a gimmick. Your view of the uses is just too narrow.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        128 days ago

        Still seems fairly narrow, the field where you train for literal RL tasks but can’t train on actual RL objects because those are living beings is fairly narrow in itself. Not to mention that there is a fairly limited number of them where you actually have to use your hands on the patient directly considering the prevalence of keyhole type surgeries in recent years where the actual patient contact is not the surgeon’s hands anymore.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      229 days ago

      I feel like you haven’t tried it. 3D TVs were fine and kinda cool. VR is still mind-blowing every time I play it.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      -129 days ago

      its a standalone device that functionally is like buying a phone with a Snapdragon 865(for older quest 2 models). relative to what you’re paying for. It’s actually not that expensive in the grand scheme of other gaming devices, as its on par/cheaper than basiaclly all other mainstream gaming devices, and on the low end in terms of smartphone pricing.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        6
        edit-2
        29 days ago

        Only if you’re willing to do business with Facebook.

        Paying you per hour to use Facebook hardware would be overpriced.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          029 days ago

          which is the condition on whether a user wants to make it cheap, else you have to go theough the trouble of sideloading the requied stuff to turn the device into a mixedvr/piracy headset by cutting off the meta related services.

          else the “cheap” option would be to go use older windows mixed VR headsets, or cheaper chinese options(e.g Pico Vr headsets), both having their own cost of using it, very similar to what you sign into for users who buy a phone, or a console.