@[email protected] to [email protected] • 2 months agoPhoronix: Linus Torvalds Comments On The Russian Linux Maintainers Being Delistedwww.phoronix.comexternal-linkmessage-square297fedilinkarrow-up1424arrow-down110cross-posted to: [email protected][email protected][email protected]phoronix
arrow-up1414arrow-down1external-linkPhoronix: Linus Torvalds Comments On The Russian Linux Maintainers Being Delistedwww.phoronix.com@[email protected] to [email protected] • 2 months agomessage-square297fedilinkcross-posted to: [email protected][email protected][email protected]phoronix
minus-square@faltrykalink11•2 months agoAll it takes is reading the article to see why it was done. You clearly did not do that and instead inserted your own agenda.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink-9•2 months agoI did read the article and drew the conclusion I just stated. Feel free to offer your own take.
minus-square@faltrykalink7•2 months agoWhile he certainly wasn’t sensitive about how he said it, he did state is was sanctions related.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink-11•2 months agoHe was not clear on that at all. For all we know it could be an excuse among the several vague ones he gave or a reference to pressure from Feds.
minus-square@faltrykalink8•2 months ago And FYI for the actual innocent bystanders who aren’t troll farm accounts - the “various compliance requirements” are not just a US thing. If you haven’t heard of Russian sanctions yet, you should try to read the news some day. And by “news”, I don’t mean Russian state-sponsored spam.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink-5•2 months agoThe “various comoliance requirements” are unstated. Everything here is being left to a vague implication.
All it takes is reading the article to see why it was done. You clearly did not do that and instead inserted your own agenda.
I did read the article and drew the conclusion I just stated. Feel free to offer your own take.
While he certainly wasn’t sensitive about how he said it, he did state is was sanctions related.
He was not clear on that at all. For all we know it could be an excuse among the several vague ones he gave or a reference to pressure from Feds.
The “various comoliance requirements” are unstated. Everything here is being left to a vague implication.