minus-squareneoman4426linkfedilink11•4 hours agoYeah, there’s a pretty decent argument that “Adam” would count as Victor’s illegitimate son
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink15•edit-24 hours agoFurthermore, as a creation of Victor Frankenstein, calling the monster “a Frankenstein” is no more inaccurate than calling Guernica “a Picasso,” or a 1996 Camry “a Toyota.”
Yeah, there’s a pretty decent argument that “Adam” would count as Victor’s illegitimate son
Furthermore, as a creation of Victor Frankenstein, calling the monster “a Frankenstein” is no more inaccurate than calling Guernica “a Picasso,” or a 1996 Camry “a Toyota.”