• @Maggoty
    link
    English
    202 months ago

    They said leave all 1967 occupied areas.

    You responded with the entire population of Israel.

    • @the_toast_is_gone
      link
      English
      -182 months ago

      And I later asked how this will appease all these other actors that just want to wipe Israel off the map. How will that happen?

      • @Maggoty
        link
        English
        112 months ago

        You mean you assumed facts not in evidence.

        • @the_toast_is_gone
          link
          English
          -132 months ago

          Does that make Iran, Hezbollah, and Hamas any more likely to establish lasting peace with Israel if they surrender a tiny sliver of land?

          • @Maggoty
            link
            English
            112 months ago

            If Israel de-occupies Palestinian and Lebanese land, stops blockading Gaza, stops blowing up chunks of it’s neighbors, then it removes any moral grounds for them to continue fighting Israel. Instead we’re to believe Israel is the defender when they’ve occupied their neighbors for 50+ years.

              • @Maggoty
                link
                English
                8
                edit-2
                2 months ago

                All of them. If you want to compare killing civilians there’s a graphic around here showing that Israel has killed far more, every year. Of course I wish they’d target active military and civilians involved specifically in Israel’s MIC. But if Israel’s strikes on hospitals are justified then so are the ones you’re worried about. You can’t have it both ways.

                • @the_toast_is_gone
                  link
                  English
                  -132 months ago

                  So, would you kill every single Israeli civilian if they were unable to leave Israel? Because that’s what Hamas and Hezbollah want to do, with the assistance of Iran.

                  • @Maggoty
                    link
                    English
                    92 months ago

                    There you go again. Assuming facts not in evidence.