• @pyre
    link
    12 months ago

    there is no statement there so I don’t know what you mean by “incorrect”. all i see is someone who doesn’t know how people use tldr.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      22 months ago

      Or someone who knows very well people use tldr to skip reading the post and you are annoyed that he caught you being that lazy.

      • @pyre
        link
        -12 months ago

        valuing my time isn’t lazy. if you can’t summarize your post you’re probably shit at writing and the article is not worth the time in the first place.

        • @lightsblinken
          link
          52 months ago

          not trying to be combative, but this grumpy response over a 5min read does illustrate something and i hope its trolling tbh. the tldr summary that is triggering here is kinda a key point of the article - people looking for a quick interaction and then moving on.

          • @pyre
            link
            -12 months ago

            this is what i mean by shit at writing.

            this fails to be the point of the article unless the article is suggesting people are moving on to quick interactions because they are deliberately being moved away from longer articles by the authors that suggest these articles aren’t worth their time… is the point of the article that longer content is belligerent and condescending?

            I don’t think it’s actually getting any point across. it’s just a boomer who thinks no one has anything better to do.

    • masterofn001
      link
      fedilink
      1
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      Was it too long for you and you didn’t read it?

      In that case …This blog post is not for you.

      That’s what the question mark does. It marks a question.

      RTFA? RTFA!

      • @pyre
        link
        02 months ago

        I didn’t read it because the tldr is retarded.