• atro_city
    link
    fedilink
    25 hours ago

    Old, rural, and in a country where >50% of the people vote for one party (which is actually multiple)? I think it’s quite safe to assume who they voted for - or that they didn’t vote at all with voter participation between 50-70% in various elections.

    • tiredofsametab
      link
      fedilink
      24 hours ago

      The LDP is huge and some people joint it even though not all views align (I assume there is some sort of loyalty/policy requirement, but I don’t know) to try to better their chances. So, based on my limited understanding, it’s one party but positions can vary to some degree.

      Voter turnout can be pretty shit, for sure.

      My area had two candidates run in the elections yesterday, but I don’t know which parties.

      A lot of rural areas actually have decent benefits and subsidies for families and kids and they are broadly supported by most parties. One problem is people feel like there are no jobs or opportunities outside of agriculture, forestry, and manufacturing. They’re not necessarily wrong. Remote work is helping, but the anxiety of being recalled due of a new policy is there. I certainly live with that fear.

      There are also worried about higher education for the kids and finding future partners (at least in the super rural areas in the latter case). Unlike Tokyo, for example, getting kids into public daycare and kindergarten is quite easy in the countryside so some do move in and later out for their kids.

      It’s a complex situation and I don’t know that any party or group has a really good handle on it.