Static credentials with passwords written into a firewall’s code. What could go wrong?

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    13
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    Right in the Security Advisory

    allow an unauthenticated, local attacker to access an affected system using static credentials.

    Edit: NVM, later it says

    The second is using SSH, which is enabled by default on the management interface of the device.

    • @horse_battery_staple
      link
      English
      144 months ago

      That could be any user logged into the CLI. Cisco is famously a network appliance company and they make admin available over the network. Anyone who can get to the LAN/VLAN these appliances are on can exploit this. So not specifically physical access.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        124 months ago

        You are right:

        The second is using SSH, which is enabled by default on the management interface of the device. SSH can also be enabled on data interfaces.

        Holy fuck.

        • borari
          link
          fedilink
          English
          24 months ago

          You are right:

          You should have gone with “correct”.

          • @horse_battery_staple
            link
            English
            5
            edit-2
            4 months ago

            Is that needed or useful criticism?

            HA! I totally missed the joke. Well played.

            • @Hawke
              link
              English
              54 months ago

              I think it’s more a reference to your username than actual criticism.

              • borari
                link
                fedilink
                English
                54 months ago

                Yeah, I thought that would land better.

                • @horse_battery_staple
                  link
                  English
                  34 months ago

                  Oh GEEZ! Sorry, I had a VERY literal day at work today. Completely flew over my head.

                  • borari
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    24 months ago

                    It’s all good. I’ve been having some of those days for what feels like the past month or two now. Hope work chills out for you!

      • @jaybone
        link
        English
        64 months ago

        Nothing prevents you from putting this on a LAN that can be accessed from over the internet.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          54 months ago

          Even if it’s not directly accessible from the internet on its own, if it’s accessible from an host exposed to the internet then anyone that can compromise a single host can immediately compromise the firewall.

          “It’s only exposed to the outdated wordpress server” is effectively the same as being exposed to the internet.

          • @jaybone
            link
            English
            54 months ago

            Yeah that’s my point. Even if the manufacturer actually limits the IP config on the mgmt interface to be configured as not routable over the internet, it could intentionally be on a subnet accessible by some kind of ssh jump server or bastion host. (Or in your example, maybe unintentionally via the Wordpress server.)

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          14 months ago

          Nothing prevents you from making it remotely accessible with the password “password” either