Because the assumption that there’s no danger, coupled with the fact there’s now oxygen inside the tank, much more likely to be near the flammable or explosive ranges.
When full or in use you expect it to have fuel in it and usually take more care (obviously the welder isn’t), and if a leak catches fire it then turns into a torch, until the tank overheats and bleve’s (very unlikely that you don’t notice the torch before the bleve)
The big risk of full is, you might have a steady leak that stays in the area, and then you ignite it somehow. But the likelihood is very low that it would get to the flammable or explosive ratio in open air like this.
I could be remembering wrong, but basically any remnants inside are unpressurized, so they’re all vapor, easy to heat since there’s less thermal mass, and ready to light if there’s any oxygen.
Empty but having once been filled is more dangerous than full.
New and empty is a different story.
Why is empty but history of being filled more dangerous than full?
Because the assumption that there’s no danger, coupled with the fact there’s now oxygen inside the tank, much more likely to be near the flammable or explosive ranges.
When full or in use you expect it to have fuel in it and usually take more care (obviously the welder isn’t), and if a leak catches fire it then turns into a torch, until the tank overheats and bleve’s (very unlikely that you don’t notice the torch before the bleve)
The big risk of full is, you might have a steady leak that stays in the area, and then you ignite it somehow. But the likelihood is very low that it would get to the flammable or explosive ratio in open air like this.
I could be remembering wrong, but basically any remnants inside are unpressurized, so they’re all vapor, easy to heat since there’s less thermal mass, and ready to light if there’s any oxygen.