• Nougat
    link
    fedilink
    1515 hours ago

    Come now, that wasn’t rape, because New York doesn’t consider “forcibly inserting your fingers into someone’s vagina against their will” as “rape.”

    And he was only found civilly liable, not convicted of a crime, because of statute of limitations. Not even civilly liable of sexual assault, but civilly liable of defamation, because he called her a liar multiple times when she reported the sexual assault incident.

    That’s not so bad, now, is it?

    • @beebarfbadger
      link
      37 hours ago

      And even if he had been found guilty of a crime, then it would just have been a rigged trial. Innocence thus proven. Checkmate, laws.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      2815 hours ago

      I know you’re being cute, but for those who don’t know the whole story: after the jury found him civilly liable, the judge made a point of publicly clarifying that yes, he was found to have raped Carroll.

      One source

      Another source

      • Nougat
        link
        fedilink
        1114 hours ago

        B-b-but “common modern parlance” isn’t the law in the state of New York! TOTALLY EXONERATED!!!

        (I have to stop now lest I vomit.)