Note: Disable JavaScript to bypass paywall.

  • @someguy3
    link
    38 hours ago

    As funny as the thought is, they won’t remove the CEO of Tesla, SpaceX, and X.

    • troed
      link
      fedilink
      128 hours ago

      Tesla and X no one really cares about. SpaceX could get nationalized (!!!) though. Musk being cozy with Putin is already a problem for the US.

      • @someguy3
        link
        17 hours ago

        Oh people care about Tesla, it’s now an important domestic manufacturer. X is more appearance of a giant media or whatever you want to call it.

          • @someguy3
            link
            0
            edit-2
            7 hours ago

            I know that people like to throw that term around but, oh you’re an ml user. Not gonna bother explaining the realities of that word.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          26 hours ago

          Given how his management decisions are impacting Tesla (pushing out buggy, dangerous “full self-driving”, cutting corners on quality, the whole Cybertruck thing, and associating the brand with his junior-sci-fi ideas long after anyone stopped thinking that he’s some kind of visionary technologist, to say nothing of the weird far-right turn and habit of impregnating employees), it could be argued that he’s strangling a company that otherwise had excellent potential, and that at this stage, it would have a better chance under other management. I’m not sure if, say, the suits at General Motors or Ford could have made as much of an impact with it as a subsidiary, but they’d have certainly killed the Cybertruck or at least made it more like a conventional SUV.