Summary

Robert F. Kennedy Jr. announced that a Trump administration would prioritize removing fluoride from public water systems, a position at odds with major health organizations like the CDC, the American Dental Association, and the American Academy of Pediatrics, all of which endorse water fluoridation as safe and beneficial for dental health.

Despite Kennedy’s controversial stance on health and environmental issues, which includes previously debunked claims linking vaccines to autism, Trump has praised his passion, stating that Kennedy would have significant freedom to influence health policy if Trump were elected.

  • Nougat
    link
    fedilink
    21623 days ago

    Roe v Wade: “This should be decided by the states!”

    Fluoride in water: “This should be decided by the federal government!”

    ???

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      144
      edit-2
      23 days ago

      They’re proposing to ban vaccines too, and they’re not mentioning particular vaccines, just “vaccines”. So no healthcare for trans people or pregnant women, and no vaccines. It’s only a matter of time before someone convinces them antibiotics are the devil’s work.

      • @InverseParallax
        link
        English
        53
        edit-2
        23 days ago

        I mean…

        At this point let’s just tell them we forbid them from drinking arsenic because, even though it massively increases testosterone production, all liberal science says most humans aren’t strong enough to handle it.

        Fucking let moron nature take its course.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          2423 days ago

          Except they’ll take a lot of us with them. We need herd immunity, clean air and water, safe roads. They’re going to fuck us all with their idiocy.

          • @InverseParallax
            link
            English
            -1323 days ago

            You can have safety, or you can have improvement via evolution.

            You can’t have both.

            • ℍ𝕂-𝟞𝟝
              link
              fedilink
              English
              1523 days ago

              You can actually, evolution is driven by selective reproduction, not selective survival. Yes, reproduction is usually tied to survival, but natural selection would still work even if everyone always lived to 80.

              It would not select for traits useful for survival though, it would most likely select for traits that get you laid.

              • @InverseParallax
                link
                English
                0
                edit-2
                23 days ago

                This requires us to prevent people from reproducing, we have to pick and choose who can breed.

                Gonna put that in the “probably not a great idea” category.

              • @rottingleaf
                link
                -323 days ago

                You have seen Idiocracy, yes? About selective reproduction.

                I’ve seen the kind of people that reproduce well. Most of them are both immoral and not very smart.

                My cousins’ parents are a good exception, though. They are exactly the kind of people that should have children, and their daughters too. My parents, on the contrary, were the kind of people about whom I’d never say that. It’s a pure miracle I’ve turned out at least kinda similar to a human.

                On the contrary, the best people I know personally of my generation either have problems they haven’t yet solved or are gay.

                OK, then thinking about myself, I actually think I’d not be that bad of a parent, in case one of those strange creatures likes me enough, but it would be really hard.

      • Billiam
        link
        3123 days ago

        someone convinces them antibiotics are the devil’s work.

        Antibiotics are proof of evolution, since the various microorganisms create resistances to vaccines.

      • nolannice
        link
        2823 days ago

        Nothing says pro life like returning to 18th century childhood mortality rates 😎

      • @rottingleaf
        link
        4
        edit-2
        23 days ago

        Antibiotics shouldn’t be used as easily as people think, though. Because, ahem, antibiotic resistance is a thing.

        It’s a responsible position to only use antibiotics when you really need it. Not when you have cold. EDIT: just in case, by cold I mean cold, not covid

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          623 days ago

          That’s the kind of responsible and sensible advice the Republicans would never give. It requires too much nuance.

          • @rottingleaf
            link
            -423 days ago

            I don’t think I’ve heard anything responsible and sensible from politicians with chances to succeed in a two party system.

    • @LovableSidekick
      link
      21
      edit-2
      23 days ago

      Breaking: Trump vows to repeal Ohm’s Law: “States should handle resistance at the local level.”

      • lazynooblet
        link
        fedilink
        English
        2423 days ago

        Violating your principals for some undetectable flouride in the water is a small price to pay for an entire area of people to receive better dental prospects.

        Flip this round. You still have a choice, buy bottled water.

      • @nexguy
        link
        723 days ago

        Fluoride isn’t medicine.